)
Former top bureaucrats have come out in support of ex-Coal Secretary P C Parakh, who has been named by CBI in the coal blocks allocation scam, warning that harassment of honest officers will erode Government's credibility and stop senior officers from taking decisions.
"Parakh, as I have known him, is an honest, competent officer. While I do not wish to comment on the CBI investigation as such, as I do not have all the facts, I am at a loss to understand how an FIR has been filed only against him and no one in the PMO and no Minister," said E A S Sarma, former Coal Secretary.
If it is a case of conspiracy, all the conspirators should be taken into account. I hope there is no conspiracy, said Sarma, a former IAS officer.
"I feel that investigations in such cases should be objective and uninfluenced by extraneous pressures. A clear distinction must be made between decisions taken in good faith and malafide decisions. It is unfortunate that dishonest Ministers, politicians and officers should be let off and honest officers harassed. It will only erode the credibility of the government which has already been on the decline in the recent times," he said.
Sarma said he has written to CVC on June 15 last year requesting it to initiate an investigation into the role of the PMO in the coalgate affair and three other scams.
"I reminded CVC at least two times after that. There has been no visible response from CVC on my letters," Sarma said.
Former Cabinet Secretary T S R Subramanian said such kind of action by CBI against Parakh will stop others from taking decisions.
"There are all kind of bureaucrats, good, bad, honest... There has to be a reasonable basis for any action by the agency," he said.
"According to the FIR, it was said Parakh met Kumar Mangalam Birla. As Cabinet Secretary, I used to meet ten bureaucrats, ten politicians and ten businessmen daily. Should that mean that I be also made an accused?" he asked.
Parakh wanted the system to be changed for good, rued Subramanian. The former Cabinet Secretary also felt that there was an "ulterior motive" behind the move to name Parakh as an accused.
"If he has been made an accused, he could be crippled as a witness. There could be an ulterior motive," he said.
