You are here: Home » Economy & Policy » News
Business Standard

Higher cigarette taxes may not benefit anti-smoking drive: Study

Over the past 50 years, regulators and advocacy groups have increasingly used counter-marketing tools to discourage cigarette consumption

IANS  |  New York 

Image via Shutterstock
Image via Shutterstock

Increasing cigarette taxes may have the unintended consequence of driving consumers to higher nicotine content and more dangerous cigarette products, says a new study co-authored by an Indian-origin researcher.

Given the addictive properties of nicotine, increasing cigarette taxes per package increases addiction levels for some consumers, the findings showed.

"While taxes are the most effective technique for reducing smoking rates, we find that this tool has a significant downside," said one of the researchers Vishal Singh from New York University.

"Because cigarette taxes are currently applied at the per pack level and without regard to nicotine levels, consumers may respond to increasing cigarette taxes by switching to higher nicotine products," Singh pointed out.

"In other words, if consumers desire to minimise the cost per unit of nicotine, then increasing cigarette taxes may lead some consumers to shift to higher nicotine products," he explained.

Over the past 50 years, regulators and advocacy groups have increasingly used counter-marketing tools to discourage cigarette consumption.

Excise taxes are used to increase prices faced by consumers. Educational advertising is used to increase awareness of health risks and decrease preferences for the category. Smoke-free policies are used to make cigarette consumption less convenient.

For the study, the researchers conducted analysis on nationwide data about store sales and examined populations of consumers that are exposed to different tax rates, advertising levels, and smoking prohibitions.

In addition, data from the US Census allowed the researchers to examine the effectiveness of counter-marketing across consumers of different socio-economic levels.

The researchers found that the different anti-smoking techniques varied in terms of effectiveness.

Importantly, the authors found that this unintended consequence of cigarette taxes was more likely to occur in poorer neighbourhoods. The study was published in the journal Marketing Science.

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Thu, October 29 2015. 14:00 IST