How contract teachers put Chhattisgarh govt to the test
With the state due to go to the polls in less than a year, the ruling BJP government has agreed to consider the long-standing demands of teachers
)
premium
When Raipur’s district collector Om Prakash Choudhary slunk into the Chhattisgarh capital’s central jail late in the evening on December 4, he was sceptical about the success of his mission. The Indian Administrative Services (IAS) officer from the 2005 batch was on an assignment to end the indefinite strike of shiksha karmis (contractual teachers) in the interest of students as annual exams were nearing.
After nearly six hours of negotiations, when Choudhary walked out of the jail past midnight, there was a big smile on his face. He had successfully convinced the leaders of shiksha karmis, who were detained and locked up in the central jail, to withdraw the strike. The breakthrough came after many hiccups and failed attempts to end the stir in the state over the previous two weeks.
The academic activities in Chhattisgarh’s 54,000 government schools had been severely affected after 180,000 shiksha karmis went on an indefinite strike on November 21 to draw attention to their working conditions. In all, the teachers had nine demands. The prominent among them was their merger with regular government teachers of the state education department contrary to the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment & Conditions of Services) Rules.
The shiksha karmis, who come under the panchayat department, wanted their service to be merged into the education department. They advocated that the grant of a different pay scale, lower than that of government employees like assistant teachers, upper division teachers and lecturers, was in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India since they were discharging the same duties and functions as their permanent counterparts. They argued the differential pay was a breach of their right guaranteed under the principle for equal pay for equal work.
The state government was, however, reluctant to meet this particular demand. “The merger (as regular teachers with education department) is unconstitutional as it is against the provisions of the Act,” said Chhattisgarh’s Panchayat Minister Ajay Chandrakar. The government was ready to discuss the other demands, but the shiksha karmis were adamant.
The state government pulled all the strings to end the strike but wasn’t successful. The administration in different places across the state imposed section 144 of the prohibitory act to avoid mobilisation of teachers. But the strategy did not work. The violation of order landed 20,000 shiksha karmis in jail. Three of the five leaders spearheading the movement were also put behind the bars.
After nearly six hours of negotiations, when Choudhary walked out of the jail past midnight, there was a big smile on his face. He had successfully convinced the leaders of shiksha karmis, who were detained and locked up in the central jail, to withdraw the strike. The breakthrough came after many hiccups and failed attempts to end the stir in the state over the previous two weeks.
The academic activities in Chhattisgarh’s 54,000 government schools had been severely affected after 180,000 shiksha karmis went on an indefinite strike on November 21 to draw attention to their working conditions. In all, the teachers had nine demands. The prominent among them was their merger with regular government teachers of the state education department contrary to the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment & Conditions of Services) Rules.
The shiksha karmis, who come under the panchayat department, wanted their service to be merged into the education department. They advocated that the grant of a different pay scale, lower than that of government employees like assistant teachers, upper division teachers and lecturers, was in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India since they were discharging the same duties and functions as their permanent counterparts. They argued the differential pay was a breach of their right guaranteed under the principle for equal pay for equal work.
The state government was, however, reluctant to meet this particular demand. “The merger (as regular teachers with education department) is unconstitutional as it is against the provisions of the Act,” said Chhattisgarh’s Panchayat Minister Ajay Chandrakar. The government was ready to discuss the other demands, but the shiksha karmis were adamant.
The state government pulled all the strings to end the strike but wasn’t successful. The administration in different places across the state imposed section 144 of the prohibitory act to avoid mobilisation of teachers. But the strategy did not work. The violation of order landed 20,000 shiksha karmis in jail. Three of the five leaders spearheading the movement were also put behind the bars.
Ajay Chandrakar, Panchayat Minister, Chhattisgarh