You are here: Home » Markets » News
Business Standard

Ban On Vessels Without Turtle Excluder Devices Allowed

BUSINESS STANDARD 

The United States has finally won the World Trade Organisation (WTO) case that challenged its ban on the import of shrimp caught by vessels without using turtle-excluder devices.

In a ruling delivered on October 22, the WTO Appellate Body said the implementation of the US sea turtle protection law was fully consistent with WTO rules. It also said the US had complied with its earlier order to end unfair discrimination between shrimp exporting nations.

The litigation on this issue began in 1996 when India, Malaysia, Thailand and Pakistan challenged the shrimp-turtle law of the US under the WTO disputes settlement procedure. They had maintained that it was inappropriate for the US to prescribe their national conservation policies for other nations as well.

Initially, these countries managed to get a favourable decision from the disputes panel in April 1998 when it ruled that the measure was inconsistent with Article XI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) which provided that WTO members would not impose any import restrictions.

But this was subsequently partially reversed by the WTO Appellate Body in response to an appeal by the US.

The number of sea turtles have tended to decline sharply over the years. This is attributed to excessive harvesting of sea turtles and their eggs and to accidental mortality associated with shrimp trawling and other fishing operations. Consequently, many species of sea turtles have become threatened with extinction.

The WTO Appellate Body said in its order in October 1998 that the US law for conservation of sea turtles was covered by the GATT exception for measures relating to conservation of exhaustible natural resources.

But, at the same time, this body found that the US had implemented the law in a way that resulted in unfair discrimination between exporting nations. It stated that WTO members might adopt environmental conservation measures such as the US law on turtle protection as long as they were administered in an even-handed manner and did not amount to disguised protectionism.

The US and other parties to the dispute, including India, subsequently reached an agreement on a 13-month compliance period which ended in December 1999.

However, though the other shrimp exporting countries took steps to introduce turtle-excluder devices in shrimp catching, Malaysia once again approached the WTO, seeking a review of the whole issue

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Sat, November 03 2001. 00:00 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.