With reference to “Court in crisis” (January 15), it was probably idealistic and tragically romantic to expect the top constitutional level to be able to shield itself from the present-day evils coming from consumerism, exchange of favours and socioeconomic fissures. That the discomfited judges did not approach the President for remedy or mediation is a sign of the loss of credibility of — or at least the lack of confidence the citizens have on the impartial, quick and fair exercise of power by — important constitutional and legally empowered authorities. The loss of the moral authority of a titular head

