Shekhar Gupta: Robbing the middle class to pay the poor?
The poor are fooled purely for their cheap thrills and entertainment, but the real joke is on the middle classes
 "The pros and cons if inheritance tax makes a comeback in Budget 2019")
premium
One key headline-point from the Narendra Modi government’s latest Budget is the raising of top tax rates for the rich earning more than Rs 2 crore a year. The increase is steeper for the super-rich above Rs 5 crore per year. The top tax rate now goes to 42.3 per cent.
It seems like such an awful example of Indira Gandhi-style “soak-the-rich” politics, people like us might say. Many others in deeply pink polity would hail it as an uplifting evidence that Modi too has fully embraced the principles of socialism as mandated in the Constitution’s post-Emergency preamble. Never mind that he leads India’s most unabashed government of the Right into its second term.
Both are wrong. Because the Modi government isn’t really soaking the rich, but the middle classes, who also happen to be its most loyal vote bank. Question: Is their unquestioning loyalty the reason the government can afford to treat them like this?
Over the past five years, the Modi government has carried out probably the most spectacular and efficient transfer, or redistribution of national wealth to the poor. It is tough to estimate it to the last decimal point, but between housing, toilets, cooking gas and Mudra loans, anything between Rs 9 trillion and Rs 11 trillion was distributed to the poor. That it was done with minimal leakage and with no discrimination of caste or religion has been acknowledged. It helped Modi win a bigger second majority. And where did this money come from?
Our immediate instinct would be to imagine it came from the rich. But not quite so. The government kept raising taxes on fuel as crude prices fell and folding the bonanza into its pocket. Most of this came from the vehicle-owning middle classes.
You can conclude, therefore, that a spectacular transfer of wealth did indeed take place to the poor. But it came from the middle classes of all strata and not particularly the rich. It also bought enough votes from the grateful poor for Modi to sweep the election.
All exit poll data, from the big cities to urbanising states, tells you that the middle classes too voted overwhelmingly for the BJP. The rapidly urbanising state of Haryana, the richest in India with very few extreme poor, is a good example. The BJP was marginal here until 2014. Now it collected 58 per cent of the vote.
This is the most important political takeaway from the way Modi has run his economy. He has taken from those in the middle to give to those at the bottom, and both are voting for him with equal enthusiasm. The middle classes have emerged as his most rock-solid vote bank. And they happily pay for it.
Now come to the latest Budget. Once again, there is that mere pretence of taking from the rich. But should it bother the rich?
BDT data shows that in the last financial year only 6,351 individuals returned incomes above Rs 5 crore with average income of Rs 13 crore. How much additional revenue will it bring? Just about Rs 5,000 crore. Not much more than a year’s turnover of the IPL, the Indian Premier League. The poor will be thrilled the rich are being socked. And the really rich will complain in whispers but keep buying anonymous electoral bonds and dropping them off in one letter box — you can guess which one. Because if they don’t, the taxman might call.
The poor are easily fooled purely for their cheap thrills and entertainment, but the real joke is on the middle classes. Because, as in 2014-19, they’re the ones who will contribute the wealth to be transferred to the poor. To begin with, the finance minister gifted them additional taxes on petrol and diesel in the Budget to “make up”, hold your breath, for the drop in crude prices.
This has followed a string of policies that can only be described as “soak the middle class” and not the rich. During the Modi years, long-term capital gains tax on equities was introduced, dividend distribution tax was increased, additional tax was levied on dividend income above Rs 10 lakh per year, surcharge on incomes between Rs 50 lakh and Rs 1 crore was raised (unless you call them super rich today), subsidies were reduced and taken away from the middle class including on cooking gas. We’d welcome the removal of these non-merit subsidies. But remember, who is paying.
It seems like such an awful example of Indira Gandhi-style “soak-the-rich” politics, people like us might say. Many others in deeply pink polity would hail it as an uplifting evidence that Modi too has fully embraced the principles of socialism as mandated in the Constitution’s post-Emergency preamble. Never mind that he leads India’s most unabashed government of the Right into its second term.
Both are wrong. Because the Modi government isn’t really soaking the rich, but the middle classes, who also happen to be its most loyal vote bank. Question: Is their unquestioning loyalty the reason the government can afford to treat them like this?
Over the past five years, the Modi government has carried out probably the most spectacular and efficient transfer, or redistribution of national wealth to the poor. It is tough to estimate it to the last decimal point, but between housing, toilets, cooking gas and Mudra loans, anything between Rs 9 trillion and Rs 11 trillion was distributed to the poor. That it was done with minimal leakage and with no discrimination of caste or religion has been acknowledged. It helped Modi win a bigger second majority. And where did this money come from?
Our immediate instinct would be to imagine it came from the rich. But not quite so. The government kept raising taxes on fuel as crude prices fell and folding the bonanza into its pocket. Most of this came from the vehicle-owning middle classes.
You can conclude, therefore, that a spectacular transfer of wealth did indeed take place to the poor. But it came from the middle classes of all strata and not particularly the rich. It also bought enough votes from the grateful poor for Modi to sweep the election.
All exit poll data, from the big cities to urbanising states, tells you that the middle classes too voted overwhelmingly for the BJP. The rapidly urbanising state of Haryana, the richest in India with very few extreme poor, is a good example. The BJP was marginal here until 2014. Now it collected 58 per cent of the vote.
This is the most important political takeaway from the way Modi has run his economy. He has taken from those in the middle to give to those at the bottom, and both are voting for him with equal enthusiasm. The middle classes have emerged as his most rock-solid vote bank. And they happily pay for it.
Now come to the latest Budget. Once again, there is that mere pretence of taking from the rich. But should it bother the rich?
BDT data shows that in the last financial year only 6,351 individuals returned incomes above Rs 5 crore with average income of Rs 13 crore. How much additional revenue will it bring? Just about Rs 5,000 crore. Not much more than a year’s turnover of the IPL, the Indian Premier League. The poor will be thrilled the rich are being socked. And the really rich will complain in whispers but keep buying anonymous electoral bonds and dropping them off in one letter box — you can guess which one. Because if they don’t, the taxman might call.
The poor are easily fooled purely for their cheap thrills and entertainment, but the real joke is on the middle classes. Because, as in 2014-19, they’re the ones who will contribute the wealth to be transferred to the poor. To begin with, the finance minister gifted them additional taxes on petrol and diesel in the Budget to “make up”, hold your breath, for the drop in crude prices.
This has followed a string of policies that can only be described as “soak the middle class” and not the rich. During the Modi years, long-term capital gains tax on equities was introduced, dividend distribution tax was increased, additional tax was levied on dividend income above Rs 10 lakh per year, surcharge on incomes between Rs 50 lakh and Rs 1 crore was raised (unless you call them super rich today), subsidies were reduced and taken away from the middle class including on cooking gas. We’d welcome the removal of these non-merit subsidies. But remember, who is paying.
Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper