He also said fiscal federalism is a dynamic process and 'a Work in Motion'.
Referring to a suggestion in the book, Singh said he too agrees that there should be some mechanism to ensure that basic spirit of devolution process is not undercut by clever financial engineering or taking recourse to traditions that makes it technical and legally tenable but perhaps morally not so.
Emphasising that rules of the game should be same for both the Centre as well as the states with regard to borrowings, Singh said, "for state government liabilities, Article 293 (3) provides a constitutional check over borrowings. But there are no such restriction on the Centre".
"I feel that it is time we have an alternative institutional mechanism like fiscal council to enforce fiscal rules and keep a check on the centre's fiscal consolidation," he said.
Singh, who had also served as revenue secretary in the finance ministry, agreed with the suggestion in the book that the Finance Commission as envisaged in the Constitution does not prohibit its continuous functioning except that it has to be re-constituted before the tenure ends every five years.
Talking to reporters later, Singh said, "we do need mechanism for enforcement which will be equally applicable for both the Centre and the states before Finance Commission or any other can work out and lay out a coherent map of fiscal consolidation".
At the book launch event, former Deputy Chairman of erstwhile Planning Commission Montek Singh Ahluwalia underlined the need for increasing allocation of funds for the municipalities.
"GST Council has no clue about what the Finance Commission is doing and Finance Commission has even lesser clue of what the GST Council is doing," he said, adding there was a need for institutional mechanism to resolve differences between the central and state governments.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)