You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

J&K govt seeks SC's nod to seek adjournment of hearing on pleas challenging Art 35A

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

The and government Monday sought permission from the to circulate a letter to parties for adjourning upcoming hearing on pleas challenging the constitutional validity of Article 35A, which provides special rights and privileges to natives of state, saying there was no "elected government" in the state.

The apex court is scheduled to hear during the week the petitions challenging the Article 35A.

A bench comprising and Justice was told by Shoeb Alam, representing the state government, that he was seeking its nod to circulate the letter to parties for getting the scheduled hearing deferred.

"On the day of listing, the undersigned (Alam) shall be requesting for an adjournment in the matter since presently there is no elected government in the state of and and the state is under rule.

"The present matter involves a sensitive issue regarding a challenge to A short reply has been filed by the state of and in the lead matter 'We the Citizens' and notices have not been issued on the other petitions. It will therefore be requesting that the matter may kindly be heard when an elected government is in place," the said in its letter.

Earlier, the apex court had deferred till January this year the hearing on pleas after the Centre and the state had said that local bodies polls there would go on till December.

The Centre and the had said the issue of Article 35A was "very sensitive" and keeping in mind the law and order aspect, the hearing be held in January or March, 2019.

"Let these matters be listed in the second week of January, 2019. All shall be taken up along with the main matter," the bench had then said.

Article 35A, which was incorporated in the Constitution by a 1954 Presidential Order, accords special rights and privileges to the citizens of Jammu and Kashmir and bars people from outside the state from acquiring any immovable property in the state.

It denies property rights to a woman who marries a person from outside the state. The provision, which leads to such women from the state forfeiting their right over property, also applies to their heirs.

The bench is hearing several petitions including the one filed by NGO 'We the Citizens' through

On August 6, last year, the apex court had said a three-judge bench would decide whether the pleas challenging Article 35A should be referred to a five-judge constitution bench for examining the larger issue of alleged violation of the doctrine of basic structure of the Constitution.

Several petitions including by political parties like the National Conference and the CPI-M, were also filed in the in support of Article 35A that also empowers the state assembly to define "permanent residents" for bestowing special rights and privileges to them.

An NGO, 'Ikkjut Jammu', has also filed a plea seeking quashing of the provision. It has said that Article 35A furthers the "two nation theory which is against the theory of secularism".

The state government, while defending the Article, had cited two verdicts of the constitution benches of the in 1961 and 1969, which had upheld the powers of the under Article 370(1)(d) of the Constitution to pass constitutional orders.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Mon, February 11 2019. 18:50 IST