Eating less meat would protect water resources in dry areas around the world, scientists say.
Researchers at Aalto University in Finland have found that reducing the use of animal products can have a considerable impact on areas suffering scarce water resources, as meat production requires more water than other agricultural products.
Diet change together with other actions, such as reduction of food losses and waste, may tackle the future challenges of food security, said researcher Mika Jalava from Aalto University.
Also Read
The researchers assessed the impact of diet change on global water resources over four scenarios, where the meat consumption was gradually reduced while diet recommendations in terms of energy supply, proteins and fat were followed.
The study, published in the journal Environmental Research Letters, is the first global-scale analysis with a focus on changes in national diets and their impact on the blue and green water use of food consumption.
Global population is expected to exceed 9 billion by 2050, adding over 2 billion mouths to be fed to the current population, according to the UN.
By reducing the animal product contribution in the diet, global green water (rainwater) consumption decreases up to 21 per cent while for blue water (irrigation water) the reductions would be up to 14 per cent.
In other words, by shifting to vegetarian diet we could secure adequate food supply for an additional 1.8 billion people without increasing the use of water resources.
The potential savings are, however, distributed unevenly, and even more important, their potential alleviation on water scarcity varies widely from country to country, researchers said.
They found substantial regional differences in diet change potential to reduce water use.
In Latin America, Europe, Central and Eastern Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa, diet change reduces mainly green water use.
In Finland, for example, turning into a meat free diet would decrease the daily green water use of a Finn over 530 litres but at the same time resulting nearly 50 litres increase in blue water use.
In the Middle East region, North America, Australia and Oceania, also blue water use would decrease considerably.
In South and Southeast Asia, on the other hand, diet change does not result in savings in water use, as in these regions the diet is already largely based on a minimal amount of products, researchers said.
The study is published in Environmental Research Letters.


