You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

White House: New law not needed for Islamic State fight

AP  |  Washington 

The Trump administration has adequate legal authority to combat terrorist groups and doesn't support a push in for a new permitting military action against the Islamic State and other militants, a senior official said today.

The comments today by legislative director Marc Short came as Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky ramped up pressure on his colleagues to reassert their power to decide whether to send American troops into harm's way.

Paul, a leader of the GOP's non-interventionist wing, wants a vote on his amendment to the annual defense policy bill that would let the authorizations after the September 11 attacks lapse after six months. He says would use the time to pass a new war authority.

Many congressional Republicans and Democrats have been clamoring for to approve a new authorization for the use of military force. But they're moving too slowly for Paul, who's demanding the deadline to ensure faster action.

Paul said yesterday he would use his senatorial power to block amendments from other lawmakers to the USD 700 billion defense policy bill unless his measure was considered.

"Where is the anti-war left demanding the wars end? Where is the constitutional conservative right demanding Congress reclaim its war powers?" Paul declared on his Twitter account.

He later said unidentified Senate leaders had "agreed to four hours of debate under my control to debate these wars." It was unclear, however, if that would culminate with a vote on his amendment.

To fight the Islamic State group, the Trump administration, as did the Obama administration, relies on an authorization for the use of military force that was approved by Congress in 2001, shortly after the September 11 attacks.

But the White House's use of an authorization from a decade and half ago is a legal stretch at best, according to critics who've argued for years that Congress needs to pass a new one to account for how the dynamics of the battlefield have changed.

For example, American troops are battling an enemy -- Islamic State militants -- that didn't exist 16 years ago in a country -- Syria -- that the US didn't expect to be fighting in.

A separate authorization for the war in Iraq approved in 2002 also remains in force.

The War Powers Resolution, enacted in 1973, requires the president to tell Congress he is sending US troops into combat and prohibits those forces from remaining for more than 90 days unless Congress has approved an authorization for military force.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Tue, September 12 2017. 22:22 IST