You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Will maintain status quo till May 21 on water supply to Delhi: Haryana

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Government today assured the that it would maintain status quo on supply of river water to the national capital till May 21 and would decide on the government's proposed request to continue the supply.

The Jal Board (DJB) told a bench comprising Justices and that they would withdraw their petition filed in the apex court in the matter and approach the Upper River Board (UYRB) immediately for continuance of release of drinking water to

One of the functions of the UYRB, set up by the Centre in 1995, is to regulate and supply water from all storage sites and barrages up to the Okhla barrage in Delhi, in accordance with the agreements between governments of six basin states of Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Delhi and

During the hearing, the for the told the bench that a request would be made today itself to for continuing the status quo relating to the release of drinking water.

The court asked to expeditiously decide on Delhi's request, saying the issue involves water for drinking purposes and not for irrigation.

"for the state of Haryana says that a decision will be taken on the request but regardless of the decision taken by the state government, the status quo will maintain till May 21, 2018. Needless to say, the state of Haryana will take an independent decision," the bench said.

"We expect the board to meet over the next couple of days and sort out the matter amicably between the state of Delhi and the state of Haryana," it said, adding it expected all UYRB members to attend the meeting so that the representatives of Delhi and Haryana could place their views.

"We leave it open to the board to take a call whether it is necessary for the basin states to be represented," the bench said, adding "the application (of DJB) is dismissed as withdrawn".

"We are glad to note that there is finally some agreement between the represented through the and the Government of Haryana," the bench noted in its order.

The top court also pulled up the for approaching the National Green Tribunal, and then the apex court in this matter and not the UYRB.

"The whole purpose of UYRB is that it should look into it since they are a professional expert body," the bench said, adding, "this kind of jockeying by the DJB on the back of should not be encouraged".

The top court was hearing DJB's plea which had alleged that Haryana had reduced by one-third the supply of water to Delhi, leading to a grave water crisis.

Haryana had earlier told the court that it would continue supplying 150 cusecs of water to Delhi till May 15 over and above what it was supplying.

Delhi had claimed that there was a shortfall of 120 cusecs of water of daily as Haryana was supplying only 330 cusecs of water a day as against 450 cusecs per day, which was agreed upon between the state and the union territory.

The DJB had sought directions from the apex court to Haryana to supply the entire 450 cusec of water per day continuously and daily to the Wazirabad reservoir.

During the hearing today, the bench asked what decision was taken by the UYRB in the matter after which A N S Nadkarni, appearing for the Centre, placed before it minutes of meeting of the board along with the recommendations.

He said the board has decided to set up a committee to look into the issue of water supply and the panel would give their recommendations within a month.

Shyam Divan, appearing for Haryana, said they have agreed to examine the request to be made by Delhi government for release of extra 150 cusecs water.

Senior Dushyant Dave, representing Delhi government, said the situation in the national capital was "extremely acute" and as on day, they wanted 1,393 cusecs of water instead of 1,507 cusecs, which was based on apex court's 1996 judgement.

However, the court said, "We are sure that Haryana will take a reasonable decision quickly (on Delhi government's request). Let them take a decision. Board will examine it".

"It is for the expert body (UYRB) to do it. It is set up only for this purpose. Why should we do what an expert body has to do," the bench said.

At the fag end of hearing, Divan said there were six basin states and if at all, Delhi withdrew additional water, there would be pro-rata reduction in water supply to other states.

Haryana had earlier told the top court that it was facing a "huge distress" for water as it was receiving only half the supply from Hathni Kund barrage located in the district.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Wed, May 16 2018. 19:40 IST