You are here: Home » US Elections » News
Business Standard

Investigative documentary says 2016 US election was exposed to fraud

An HBO investigative television documentary Kill Chain graphically portrayed what happened in the 2016 presidential contest and how the electoral system could easily be hacked

Topics
US Presidential elections 2020 | Donald Trump | 2016 US Presidential elections

Ashis Ray  |  London 

Kill Chain, HBO investigative documentary
It interviewed a shadowy hacker with a South Indian accent who reportedly entered the main computer of the election in Alaska 4 years ago from an IP address of a New Delhi power plant | Photo: HBO

The election of the President of the US was wide open to and other malpractices from state actors and lone wolves. Sandy Clark, a security researcher at Pennsylvania University, said: “Those of us who know how vulnerable the voting systems are in these elections are terribly afraid.”

An HBO investigative television documentary Kill Chain graphically portrayed what happened in the 2016 presidential contest and how the electoral system could easily be hacked, because of the weaknesses of the voting machines and the absence of reliable paper trail, among other shortcomings.

It interviewed a shadowy hacker with a South Indian accent who reportedly entered the main computer of the election in Alaska four years ago from an IP address of a New Delhi power plant and was apparently capable of causing havoc.

Going by a pseudonym of @cyberheist2, the man said: “I mean, literally, I could have made any changes in the system. I could delete the candidate. I could alter any data, any vote.” He claimed he refrained from doing so for fear that if he was caught, he would be “destroyed”.

ALSO READ: US Elections 2020: Joe Biden wins all five votes in Dixville Notch

In the US, the home of capitalism, even elections are outsourced to the private sector, with three companies (accused of a lack of transparency) providing hardware and software and non-governmental institutions entrusted to conduct them. They are also decentralised to the extent of counties and districts within the 50 states that comprise the country enjoying authority over the process.

The programme began with a former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey being asked by a US Senate committee: “Do you have any doubt that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 elections?” He emphatically answered: “None.”

Ion Sancho, who was supervisor of elections in a county in Florida, corroborated that in 2016 he was on a conference call in which the FBI warned “a foreign power had penetrated a vendor which does work in Florida”. He added: “It didn’t take us long to figure out that they were talking about the GRU, i.e., Russia’s military intelligence service.”

ALSO READ: US Elections LIVE: Polling stations open in New York, New Jersey, Virginia

Machine malfunction was reported from a number of counties in various states for different reasons. Sancho said: “There is no such thing as a glitch. That’s a term we use to hide problems.”

Twenty-five-year-old Reality Winner, an intelligence contractor, leaked a top-secret National Security Agency intercept which established attacks on software around the states. She was convicted and imprisoned for five years. Sancho described her as a “heroine”.

us presidential elections, mail-in, voting, ballot, polls

A voter deposits a ballot into an official ballot drop box in Washington DC | Photo: Bloomberg

Every state was allegedly targeted. Michael Daniel, who was a White House cybersecurity coordinator during the 2016 election, remarked: “This was a very large-scale operation, beyond anything we had really anticipated.”

Harri Hursti, a Finnish specialist in hacking techniques and the prime mover behind the probe, asserted: “Everything is hackable, always.” A model of a voting machine that Hursti exposed by hacking it in 2005 was slated to be used in 20 of the American states in the 2020 election.

ALSO READ: 'I told you so': The one pollster who is sure Donald Trump is going to win

Clark emphasised: “These are just computers. We call them voting machines. But they are nothing more than obsolete computers.” She recommended an optical scanner to record ballots.

Donald trump, joe biden

US Republican President and Democratic rival Joe Biden

There were demonstrations of multiple frailties. Hacking could be carried out wirelessly or any time a voting machine was linked to a local area network. It only needs selective intervention, such as in voting centres in certain precincts, to alter the outcome. For instance, if there is subtle interference in an area known to be heavily in favour of one of the candidates or parties, transforming the voting here can decisively favour opponents.

Philip Stark, professor of statistics at University of California, Berkeley, maintained: “The best technology for voter verifiability is hand-marked ballots.” Alternatively, he suggested: “You start looking at paper and you keep looking at paper until you have convincing evidence that looking at all of it wouldn’t change the result.” He explained it as “an intelligent incremental recount that stops as soon as it’s clear it’s pointless”.

Professor Alex of Michigan University, well known for his knowledge of voting machines, highlighted it’s important to “make sure what’s on that paper matches the results that the computers are saying”.

The US Election Assistance Commission is an advisory body with sensitive data on all states. Its secure site was also hacked. However, its chair Thomas Hicks argued American elections are secure. At the US Senate, the Republican majority leader Mitch McConnell has blocked legislation for corrective measures.

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Tue, November 03 2020. 21:24 IST