Even as the discussions are at an early stage, the industry is already worked up about it. “I do not know if that is real or not. It would have to be a zero-fee tax for merchants and consumers. Else, we would not see the growth and numbers we all are expecting,” said Paytm’s top boss Vijay Shekhar Sharma.
According to industry experts, levying a cess
on companies is not a way to enhance cyber security
of digital payments and creating such a corpus is not a way of handling the country’s digital payments security.
“The problem is not that there is no money to solve these security issues. Who implements these security transaction issues? It will be the transaction providers, the PPIs, banks, MasterCard, Paytm. They’re not saying that they don’t have money to do that. Some of the issues are all digital transactions are heading towards mobile and we’re going down this pyramid of lower literacy users who are not aware of security issues and services. The biggest problem so far has been someone calling you up and saying I need to verify who you are and I’m going to send you a code and you give it to me,” said Prasanto K Roy, VP and head of Nasscom Internet Council.
Experts believe that the government needs more innovative ways to secure the cyber space in the country and a cess
is more like a punishment which would not help in the long run.
“If it feels like a punishment, a lot of companies would not feel happy about it. Cyber security
should be more about inculcating the idea of making the network safer, and not just a cess,” said Pavan Duggal, cyber law expert and a Supreme Court advocate.
Digital payments companies have also been scratching their heads as they believe that they are anyway spending a chunk of their expenses on making transactions safer.
“We spend nearly 15 per cent of our monthly cost on cyber security.
The idea should be to make the regulations stricter and making the whole cyber security
apparatus better,” said Bipin Preet Singh, founder and CEO, MobiKwik.