You are here: Home » Finance » News » Banks
Business Standard

CAG raps govt-owned banks for understating non-performing assets

Govt told to be consistent on capital infusion criteria

Indivjal Dhasmana  |  New Delhi 

debt, loan

The (CAG) has slammed the managements and statutory auditors of 12 public sector (PSBs) for overstating their net profit, by underestimating non-performing assets (NPAs) and under-providing for these bad assets during 2016-17.

Also, there were differences in the classification of and provisioning for assets between five and the Reserve Bank (RBI) but as the divergence did not fall within the criteria fixed by the latter, it had not been disclosed by these lenders, the audit watchdog said in its report, presented to Parliament on Friday.

The 12 are Allahabad Bank, Bank of Maharashtra, Central Bank of India, Corporation Bank, Dena Bank, Syndicate Bank, Vijaya Bank, Punjab National Bank, Indian Overseas Bank, of Commerce, Punjab and Sind Bank, and United Bank of

The highest underestimation was made by Bank of Maharashtra, by Rs 3,034 crore, followed by Central Bank of (Rs 2,097 crore), Corporation Bank (Rs 1,954 crore) and of Commerce (Rs 1,350 crore).

The said the primary responsibility in adequate provisioning for any diminution in the value of loan assets, investment or other assets is of the bank managements and the statutory auditors. The assessment made by the inspecting officer of RBI is given to assist the management and the auditors in taking a decision, in terms of prudential guidelines, it said.

"In conformity with the prudential norms, provisions should be made on on the basis of classification of assets into prescribed categories," it said.

also observed that the criteria for infusing capital was changed by the government in between. It said,"signed (agreements) in the February-March period in 2012 with the department of financial services for performance-linked capital infusion during 2011-12 to 2014-15. However, achievement against the (agreed-on) targets was not linked to actual capital infusion."

The basis for parameters on capital infusion changed between actual and estimated values, both year to year and often within different tranches in the same year. "For FY15, there was a shift from need-based to performance-based capital infusion, with return on assets being employed as the basic criteria."

It recommended that the criteria for fund infusion, once finalised, be consistently applied across all In cases of variation, the reasons should be well documented.

also expressed doubt over the possibility of raising about Rs 1 lakh crore from the market by 2019, even as the ministry asserted that the large ones would succeed in tapping funds. The audit body said there were significant gaps between book value and market value of PSB shares, with most of these having a lower market value. This might come in their way for approaching the market.

The government's 'Indradhanush' plan (2015-19) envisages that would raise Rs 1.1 lakh crore over this period from the market, along with capital infusion of Rs 70,000 crore from the public treasury, to meet their assessed capital requirement of Rs 1.8 lakh crore under the Basel-III global risk norms. So far (January 2015-March 2017), have raised Rs 7,726 crore from the market. Which "raises doubts on the possibility of raising the balance by 2019", it said.

 

graph

First Published: Sat, July 29 2017. 01:29 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU