You are here: Home » Current Affairs » News » National
Business Standard

Intention of Rafale petitioners is to present incomplete picture: Def Min

The apex court on Wednesday rejected the government's contention that sensitive documents accessed by the media on the Rafale deal can't be evidence

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

nirmala sitharaman
Nirmala Sitharaman at the press conference | Photo: ANI

The petitioners in the case are using certain documents with the intention to present a selective and incomplete picture of internal secret deliberations relating to security, the said, in its reaction to the Supreme Court's order on the contentious issue.

The apex court on Wednesday rejected the government's contention that sensitive documents accessed by the media on the can't be evidence and said it will examine the papers while reviewing its order of December 14 last year when a clean chit was given to the deal.

The top court said review petitions against its earlier verdict dismissing all petitions against procurement of Rafale jets will be decided on merits.

"It is reiterated that the petitioners are using documents with the intention to present a selective and incomplete picture of internal secret deliberations on a matter relating to security and defence," the said.

ALSO READ: Govt has no official secrets act to hide behind: Oppn hails SC Rafale order

Classified documents were sourced by the media over the Citing internal reports of the Defence Ministry, The Hindu daily had come out with a series of stories including one on how the had objected to parallel negotiations carried out by the Prime Minister's Office on the deal.

Citing the sensitive documents, the petitioners in the case had sought a review of the Supreme Court's December 14 order in the case.

The Centre had claimed privilege over the documents pertaining to the Rafale fighter jet deal with France and said those documents cannot be considered in evidence as per Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act.

In its reaction, the defence ministry said the documents presented by the petitioners are failing to bring out how the issues were addressed and resolved and necessary approvals of the competent authorities taken.


ALSO READ: You can lie but sooner or later the truth comes out: Cong to Modi on Rafale

"These are selective and incomplete presentation of the facts and records by the petitioners," the ministry said.

It said the government provided the requisite information as desired by the Supreme Court and also to the petitioners as per directions of the court.

"The government also provided all records and files as required by CAG. The main concern of the government is relating to availability of sensitive and classified information concerning security in public domain," it added.

The judgment makes it clear that during the hearing of the review petition the bench will look into not only the question of pricing of the jet but also selection of Indian offset partner of Dassault which manufactures Rafale.

First Published: Wed, April 10 2019. 17:00 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU