You are here: Home » Economy & Policy » News
Business Standard

Rejig of FDI policy in offing

Govt is trying to minimise layers of caps, clearly define the break-up of FDI and foreign institutional investment sub-limits

Vrishti Beniwal  |  New Delhi 

After the foreign direct investment (FDI) reforms of September last year, the government is set for another overhaul of the FDI policy — to give a simpler structure to foreign investors. The idea is to minimise layers of caps, clearly define the FDI break-up and foreign institutional investment (FII) sub-limits, besides removing ambiguity on greenfield (new) and brownfield (expansion) projects.

The Department of industrial Policy & Promotion (DIPP) is likely to circulate a Cabinet note on the changes.

“There are different caps. In some cases FDI-FII break-up is given, but in some it is not there. There is a negative list where FDI is not permitted; distinction between brownfield and greenfield investment is too complicated; and then there are the automatic and approval routes,” said a finance ministry official who did not wish to be named.

In some sectors like pharmaceuticals and airports, FDI in brownfield projects is permitted, only with government’s approval, whereas there is automatic approval for greenfield ones. The government may look to remove the brownfield-greenfield distinction. The official said FDI ceilings and norms were the same for existing and new projects if the distinction was not clearly specified in the policy.

Last month, AirAsia’s proposal for 49 per cent FDI in a new airline with Tata Sons had become a subject of controversy, with the civil aviation ministry saying the word ‘operating’ in the policy meant FDI was allowed only in existingprojects. The finance ministry and DIPP insisted it included all projects, as greenfield ceiling was not defined separately.

“In some sectors like print media, only 26 per cent FDI is allowed but people bring in FII, as the sub-limit is not specified. There are two views on FDI-FII caps. One is that there should be a composite cap for FDI and FII. The other is that the break-up of FDI and FII limits should be clearly defined. As a matter of policy, the government would always promote FDI more than FII,” said another official.

He added the government would try to minimise layers in FDI ceilings. At present, there are ceilings — at 26 per cent, 49 per cent, 51 per cent, 74 per cent and 100 per cent. There has been an argument that keeping two caps below 51 per cent does not serve any purpose.

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Fri, April 26 2013. 00:57 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.