You are here: Home » Economy & Policy » News
Business Standard

SC has strict conditions for drug tests on humans

Govt assures the bench that the procedure will be strictly followed

BS Reporter  |  New Delhi 

The Supreme Court on Monday relaxed its earlier stand on clinical trials of new drugs and chemical entities on humans but insisted on strict regulations being in place before approval of any tests.

Of 162 chemicals under scrutiny, the court was informed by the government counsel that five had been cleared by the new drug advisory committee. These and the remaining 157 will have to be reviewed by two other panels. The Drug Advisory Consultative Committee and its apex body have to examine the trials even if the advisory committee has approved of these. The government assured the bench headed by judge R M Lodha that the procedure would be strictly followed.

On September 30, the SC had directed the Union health ministry to stop all trials till a safety mechanism was in place to properly monitor these. The order sent shock waves in the drug industry; it had also put on hold several projects involving foreign pharmaceutical entities.

These directions were given on a batch of public interest petitions, led by a Swasthiya Adhikar Manch, Indore. These had been moved after a clinical test scam in that city, where several doctors and hospitals were accused of conducting trials on patients without their knowledge or consent. The next hearing in the case will be on December 16.

On Monday, as mentioned earlier, the SC appeared to relax the curb, with some tough conditions. While approving the tests, the authorities shall balance the risks and benefits. Innovation vis-a-vis the existing options are to taken into account. Need for the chemical tested should be assessed before granting approval. The judges also had a query on how many of the chemicals proposed to be tested had been patented abroad and whether these would help this country.

The judges clarified they were not against tests being conducted but wanted a foolproof regulatory regime, quarantined from extraneous considerations. Private investigators were not likely to be independent; there should be experts paid for by the government, they said. The additional solicitor general assured them that government experts were on the committees.

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Tue, October 22 2013. 00:13 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.