Employee can't insist on transfer to particular place, rules top court

The apex court observed this while dismissing a petition by a lecturer challenging a October 2017 order of the Allahabad High Court


New Delhi
An employee cannot insist on a transfer to a particular place and it is for the employer to shift the staff considering the requirement, the Supreme Court has said.
The apex court observed this while dismissing a petition by a lecturer challenging a October 2017 order of the Allahabad High Court.
The high court had dismissed her plea against the rejection of her representation by the authority concerned for transfer from Amroha to Gautam Buddha Nagar.
"It is not for the employee to insist to transfer him/her and/or not to transfer him/her at a particular place. It is for the employer to transfer an employee considering the requirement, an apex court bench of justices M R Shah and Aniruddha Bose said in its September 6 order.
In her petition filed in the high court, the woman, who was posted as a lecturer in Amroha district, had said that she had made a representation for her transfer to a college at Gautam Buddha Nagar and it was rejected in September 2017 by the authority.
Her counsel had argued before the high court in 2017 that she was working at Amroha for the last four years and under the government policy, she was entitled to a transfer.

Also Read

Death toll climb to 72 in South Africa riots after Jacob Zuma jailed

S African Reserve Bank seizes R20m from Gupta-owned Sahara Computers' bank

US Labour Dept seeks public input on determining H-1B wage levels

Biden nominates Indian-American as 1st Muslim religious freedom ambassador

Employee can challenge terms of service in some cases: Supreme Court

Pensioners body seeks PM intervention in release of DA, DR arrears

MP: 139 diamonds worth over Rs 1 crore to be auctioned in Panna

Search operation underway to find suspected terrorists in J&K's Rajouri

Committed to development of tribal communities: J-K Lt Guv Manoj Sinha

Another fatality takes toll due to viral fever, dengue to 58 in Firozabad

The high court had noted that the order passed by the authority concerned showed that she had remained posted at a college at Gautam Buddha Nagar for about 13 years from the date of her initial appointment in December 2000 to August 2013 and, therefore, her request for posting her again at the same institution was not justified.
In its order, the high court had said the petitioner was not entitled to be posted at a place where she had already worked at a stretch for about 13 years.
The high court had said that in case the petitioner has completed the requisite number of years at the place of her present posting, she may request for transfer to some other place but not to a place where she had already worked for 13 years.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Sep 12 2021 | 3:32 PM IST

Explore News