In Beijing, Rawat replaces Vikram Misri who had a three-year stint and possibly not a single day without challenges. In June last year, the Galwan clash that saw 20 Indian soldiers killed was the culmination of border tension that had been building up for more than three years from the 73-day stand-off at Doklam in 2017. As joint secretary (East Asia) from 2014 to 2017, it was Rawat who saw the military build-up and also helped defuse it through negotiation. Bilateral ties are arguably at their lowest point. Rawat is in a position to judge because he’s seen better days as well: He was posted in Hong Kong, and then in Beijing, between 1992 and 1997 through the tumultuous days of the handing over of Hong Kong by Britain back to China, returning to work in the East Asia Division for three years. A second four-year term in Beijing in 2003, initially as counsellor and then as the deputy chief of mission, followed. This coincided with two breakthroughs on the boundary question with the appointment of special representatives in 2003 and an agreement on political parameters and guiding principles in 2005.
He moved to Taiwan two years later, serving as head of the India-Taipei Association, the de facto ambassador, for the next four years. This makes his career profile quite unique: India’s envoys to Beijing have rarely, if ever, had the experience of serving in Taipei as well. India is cautiously scaling up its relations with Taiwan, much to the irritation of China. Earlier this year, two MPs — Meenakshi Lekhi and Rahul Kaswan — participated in the virtual swearing-in ceremony of Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen. Although in the winter session of Parliament, Minister of State for External Affairs V Muraleedharan made it clear that India does not have formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan, and the two sides have only trade and people-to-people ties, even the most innocuous diplomatic moves are watched closely by Beijing, which views Taiwan as its province, while the island authorities maintain that it is an autonomous country.
Misri’s send-off and the reaction in Chinese media to Rawat’s appointment suggest the tide in Sino-Indian ties might be turning. They could be straws in the wind. But during a virtual farewell to Misri, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said: “China and India are two ancient civilisations, two emerging economies, and neighbours that cannot be moved away. When we build mutual trust, even the Himalayas cannot stop us from friendly exchanges. Without mutual trust, it is difficult to bring the two sides together, even if there are no mountains in the way. China and India should become partners and friends. The important consensus that China and India should not be a threat to each other, but an opportunity for each other’s development, which reached by the leaders of the two countries, should continue to be adhered to [sic].” Misri responded: “Although there are still dark clouds in the sky, we have already seen the silver lining in the dark clouds.”
Local media is quite approving of India’s choice of envoy. While noting that individuals have a limited role in diplomacy, Wang Dehua, from the Shanghai Municipal Centre for International Studies, was quoted as saying that despite the impasse on border talks, Rawat’s appointment was a good sign. And there were others, too: Sino-Indian cooperation during the Glasgow climate change summit, specifically on coal; and India’s reticence over calls for an international investigation into the origins of Covid-19. China views this “as a big favour” by India, Wang was quoted as saying. And a new ambassador who was fluent in Mandarin would ease relations further.
Of course, this does not factor in the political and economic changes China is undergoing. Analysts say the resolution passed after the Sixth Plenum of the Communist Party’s 19th Central Committee (the full text came out on November 16) shows that Xi Jinping still faces constraints on his ability to impose sweeping or controversial policy changes and suggests that his influence is preeminent but not absolute, and consensus and factional compromise remain more important than commonly believed. Could this push Xi to more ultra-nationalist positions with one target being India? Rawat will have to steer the course.