HC rejects plea for questioning Modi by Nanavati

In a reprieve for Chief Minister Narendra Modi, on Wednesday rejected a petition for summoning him to the Nanavati Commission for questioning in connection with the 2002 post-Godhra riots, observing there was no substance in the plea.

A division bench of Justice and Sonia Gokani while dismissing the application of NGO Jan Sangarsh Manch (JSM) said the Commission that is probing the riots has larger discretionary powers to summon witnesses. JSM's lawyer Mukul Sinha said they will approach the Supreme Court against the High Court order.

"The High Court has held that it is at the discretion of the Commission to allow or disallow cross-examination." he said. JSM, representing some riot victims, had approached the High Court for directing the Commission to call Modi for questioning after the Commission of Justice and Justice had rejected it's plea to summon him.

BJP welcomed the HC order saying Modi stands vindicated.

"It(order) once again showed that there is no material on record as of now against the Chief Minister for the events (riots) to take place," BJP leader and lawyer said.

"The Chief Minister stands vindicated," he said.

Reacting to the verdict, Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid spoke against mixing legal and political issues.

He said the matters should be either left to the court or they be settled politically. Sinha had submitted in the court that Modi should be summoned by the Commission as the role of the Chief Minister fell within the ambit of its inquiry. There are many questions related to riots that can be answered only by the Chief Minister, he said.

How will the truth come out if there is no examination or cross-examination, Sinha asked.

Advocate General Kamal Trivedi, appearing for the state government, had submitted that the appeal is not maintainable under law as the Commission's Act does not allow any third party to demand for questioning of any person.

Trivedi said it is for the Commission to decide whom it should call for questioning.

image
Business Standard
177 22
Business Standard

HC rejects plea for questioning Modi by Nanavati

Press Trust Of India  |  Mumbai/ Ahmedabad 



In a reprieve for Chief Minister Narendra Modi, on Wednesday rejected a petition for summoning him to the Nanavati Commission for questioning in connection with the 2002 post-Godhra riots, observing there was no substance in the plea.

A division bench of Justice and Sonia Gokani while dismissing the application of NGO Jan Sangarsh Manch (JSM) said the Commission that is probing the riots has larger discretionary powers to summon witnesses. JSM's lawyer Mukul Sinha said they will approach the Supreme Court against the High Court order.

"The High Court has held that it is at the discretion of the Commission to allow or disallow cross-examination." he said. JSM, representing some riot victims, had approached the High Court for directing the Commission to call Modi for questioning after the Commission of Justice and Justice had rejected it's plea to summon him.

BJP welcomed the HC order saying Modi stands vindicated.

"It(order) once again showed that there is no material on record as of now against the Chief Minister for the events (riots) to take place," BJP leader and lawyer said.

"The Chief Minister stands vindicated," he said.

Reacting to the verdict, Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid spoke against mixing legal and political issues.

He said the matters should be either left to the court or they be settled politically. Sinha had submitted in the court that Modi should be summoned by the Commission as the role of the Chief Minister fell within the ambit of its inquiry. There are many questions related to riots that can be answered only by the Chief Minister, he said.

How will the truth come out if there is no examination or cross-examination, Sinha asked.

Advocate General Kamal Trivedi, appearing for the state government, had submitted that the appeal is not maintainable under law as the Commission's Act does not allow any third party to demand for questioning of any person.

Trivedi said it is for the Commission to decide whom it should call for questioning.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

HC rejects plea for questioning Modi by Nanavati

In a reprieve for Chief Minister Narendra Modi, Gujarat High Court on Wednesday rejected a petition for summoning him to the Nanavati Commission for questioning in connection with the 2002 post-Godhra riots, observing there was no substance in the plea.

In a reprieve for Chief Minister Narendra Modi, on Wednesday rejected a petition for summoning him to the Nanavati Commission for questioning in connection with the 2002 post-Godhra riots, observing there was no substance in the plea.

A division bench of Justice and Sonia Gokani while dismissing the application of NGO Jan Sangarsh Manch (JSM) said the Commission that is probing the riots has larger discretionary powers to summon witnesses. JSM's lawyer Mukul Sinha said they will approach the Supreme Court against the High Court order.

"The High Court has held that it is at the discretion of the Commission to allow or disallow cross-examination." he said. JSM, representing some riot victims, had approached the High Court for directing the Commission to call Modi for questioning after the Commission of Justice and Justice had rejected it's plea to summon him.

BJP welcomed the HC order saying Modi stands vindicated.

"It(order) once again showed that there is no material on record as of now against the Chief Minister for the events (riots) to take place," BJP leader and lawyer said.

"The Chief Minister stands vindicated," he said.

Reacting to the verdict, Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid spoke against mixing legal and political issues.

He said the matters should be either left to the court or they be settled politically. Sinha had submitted in the court that Modi should be summoned by the Commission as the role of the Chief Minister fell within the ambit of its inquiry. There are many questions related to riots that can be answered only by the Chief Minister, he said.

How will the truth come out if there is no examination or cross-examination, Sinha asked.

Advocate General Kamal Trivedi, appearing for the state government, had submitted that the appeal is not maintainable under law as the Commission's Act does not allow any third party to demand for questioning of any person.

Trivedi said it is for the Commission to decide whom it should call for questioning.

image
Business Standard
177 22
Widgets Magazine

More News

Widgets Magazine

Widgets Magazine

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard