You are here: Home » Companies » News
Business Standard

CAG raps Odisha land acquisitions

Jindal, Aditya Aluminium, Vedanta among firms benefiting from arbitrary use of emergency provisions, according to CAG report

BS Reporter  |  Bhubaneswar 

The Comptroller & Auditor General of India (CAG) has rapped arbitrary use of emergency provisions under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire 7,025 acres of private land in Odisha for 20 between 1995 and 2008.

The industries that benefited includes Jindal Steel & Power, Aditya Aluminium, Sterlite Energy, Jindal Stainless, Monnet Power, Rungta Mines and Vedanta Aluminium (now Sesa Sterlite).

The land was acquired at a cost of Rs 206 crore, when the current market valuation was Rs 738 crore. The emergency provisions were misused during the reign of both the Congress (1995-2000) and the incumbent Biju Janata Dal, in power since 2000.

Under Section 5 of the Act, land can be acquired under emergency grounds, provided the purpose for such acquisition is achieved within six months from the date of notification. Funds available for public purposes would lapse if not spent within the prescribed timeline.

The central auditor, however, observed that in the case of these 20 companies, none of the emergency grounds were fulfilled. The audit scrutiny was in respect of 92 of 225 test-checked cases. In all the 92 cases, the state's land acquisition agency, Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation, recommended application of emergency provisions by citing a generic reason that the projects would be executed on a priority basis.

“In respect of acquisition of 4,370 acres in 58 cases, the revenue and disaster management department took six to 34 months for issue of order for acquisition under Section 7, indicating there was actually no necessity for invoking the emergency provision and the public purpose to be achieved. In the acquisition of 1,241 acres for two industries, the entire land remained unutilised/vacant (as of March 2013) even after four to five years of handing over (July 2008 to March 2009), diluting the necessity for invoking the emergency provision,” said the report.

It noted the land owners were deprived of the rights to contest the acquisition and protect their property, due to inappropriate application of the emergency provision.

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Fri, June 27 2014. 00:15 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.