You are here: Home » Companies » Features
Business Standard

Five reasons why April 1 will be a red-letter day for big pharma

If Novartis wins the case for patenting Glivec, it could result in the end of affordable medicines for substantially large section of the Indian population

Shishir Asthana  |  Mumbai 

Judgment on one of the most closely watched legal battles in the pharmaceutical industry is expected to be announced by the Supreme Court on April 1, 2013. At the root of the dispute is Novartis’ drug Glivec, which combats a rare type of cancer and stomach tumours.

In November 2003, Novartis was granted exclusive marketing right (EMR) to sell the drug for five years. Indian argued Glivec was merely an alteration of an old drug and, therefore, did not satisfy the novelty criterion under the Patents Act, nor did it introduce any improvement in the efficacy of the drug.

After losing two challenges in the Madras High Court, Novartis approached the Supreme Court, challenging a technicality of section 3(d) of the Patents Act.

Following are the five reasons why the judgment is closely watched worldwide

  • If Novartis wins the case, patents in India would be granted as broadly as they are in wealthy countries, and on new formulations of known medicines already in use.
  • Novartis had launched Glivec with a price tag of Rs 1.2 lakh for one month’s dosage. After Indian generic were allowed to sell the product they brought the price down to Rs 10,000 per month. Prices might shoot up again if Novartis wins.
  • India’s status of being the ‘pharmacy of the world’ would also be impacted by the judgment, as domestic have played an important role in providing cheap life-saving drugs to under-developed and developing countries across the world.
  • Several patent oppositions filed by public interest groups in India cite Section 3d as an argument to reject patent application on key medicines. A judgment in favour of Novartis will open all previous issues
  • If the substance is taken out of Section 3(d), abusive ‘evergreening’ practices - where drug companies maintain artificially high prices on medicines for longer by ever-extending patent protection thanks to minor modifications to existing drugs – will be much easier in the future.
With few blockbuster drugs being discovered by big pharmaceutical companies, global firms have been extending their patent period by tweaking existing molecules. A British medical journal published a study rating barely five per cent of all newly patented drugs as breakthrough.

No doubt big pharma have a lot to lose, which explains their persistent effort in trying to achieve a breakthrough legally if not through their research and developments.

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Thu, March 28 2013. 16:45 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.