You are here: Home » Companies » News
Business Standard

Taxman turns heat on PEs over transfer pricing

Claims for services rendered by local arms of funds on rise

N Sundaresha Subramanian & Reghu Balakrishnan  |  New Delhi/Mumbai 

The seems to have turned to funds this year to increase his kitty. Several Indian fund managers have received heavy tax demands for services rendered to their foreign parents.

While the says the PEs are offering services and comparing their staff costs with the commission earned by merchant banks for deals, the funds are arguing these are ancillary services and cannot be compared.

ALSO READ: Govt allows tax-free bonds for 13 PSUs

According to legal experts, the demands are unfortunate and have often been steep. Bijal Ajinkya, partner, Khaitan & Co, said: “The PE industry has been unfortunately clad with heavy tax demands from the tax department on the side. The advisory fee paid to the India-based advisors by the offshore managers has been a subject matter of tax litigation, whereby the tax authorities have been contending that the profit margin comprised in the advisory fee paid by the offshore manager to the India-based manager is insufficient as against the functions, assets and risks assumed by the Indian advisor vis-à-vis the offshore manager.”


NEW CHALLENGES
  • Investment advisory functions of Indian arms under scanner
  • compares these with services
  • Lack of comparables complicates issue
  • Results in a situation where offshore advisor’s fee is a fourth of the Indian
  • Funds focus on clarity in documentation

Last year, the income tax tribunal at Mumbai had held in the case of Carlyle India Advisors Private Limited that the comparable selected by the taxpayer cannot be rejected by the officer (TPO) without providing any cogent reasons. The tribunal also observed that the comparables selected by were not functionally comparable, by virtue of being engaged in merchant banking, earning syndication fees, issue management fees, brokerage commission, underwriting fees etc.

In this case, the had compared the services provided by Carlyle India with that of financial services firms such as Edelweiss Capital, Centrum Capital, etc. However, the ruling itself has not deterred the tax authorities from exploring similar issues with other funds.

Lawyers said there have been times when the tax authorities have had the transfer pricing adjustment done at almost four times of the profit margin declared by the Indian advisor. Such claims have at times led to a situation where the offshore manager draws lower amount than the Indian advisor due to the transfer pricing adjustment being done on assessment, without giving credence to the functions, assets and risks assumed by the offshore manager.

“The documentation has to be impeccable. Otherwise, we will land in trouble,” said a senior official with a Delhi-based fund. Many local arms of PE funds are revisiting their agreements with their parents and ensuring that the right words are used at right places to describe the services they provide to avoid claims in crores of rupees and potential litigation.

Ajinkya of Khaitan added the rise in number of transfer pricing cases is largely due to the absence of having listed comparables in both the data bases, which are to be used to for undertaking the transfer pricing study.

First Published: Thu, August 15 2013. 01:26 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU