The catastrophic slump of the once-vaunted water and power company, Hyflux, has stunned debtholders, who stand to lose about 90 per cent. About 400 to 500 of those individual investors gathered in a downtown park known as the Speaker’s Corner on Saturday, carrying placards and posters.
“There are a lot of questions that need answers,” said Ray Ho, a 65-year-old retiree who has invested in the company’s perpetual bonds. Investments were “a leap of faith. These are people’s life savings. How can you expect retail investors that are not-so-sophisticated to make the distinctions?”
Wendy Yap, 48, said she put in about S$70,000 ($52,000) in Hyflux shares in 2014 and left her investments untouched for at least three years in the belief that utility firms were cash cows.
“It’s already a gone case,” she said, adding that her husband had also made a separate investment in the company. “But is there a lack of care here? We need to know the answer.”
At the heart of the debacle is Tuaspring, Hyflux’s desalination and power plant that was heralded as one of the “national taps” for an island that had long depended on importing water and harvesting rainwater for survival. Tuaspring was opened to great fanfare in September 2013, but losses snowballed after its gas-turbine power plant started selling excess capacity in 2016 to the power grid, which had a glut of electricity caused by liberalisation of the market.
Hyflux’s stumble has spotlighted the plight of about 34,000 retail investors who were lured by the promise of a six per cent annual return forever from a company that seemed to have a gold seal of government approval.
Investors who bought into S$900 million of Hyflux’s perpetual securities have been angered by the steep haircut that would be imposed by the company under its S$2.8 billion restructuring plan. As junior creditors, they stand to lose about 90 per cent while senior creditors are staring at a 75 per cent loss. Hyflux’s rescue plan will be put to vote by creditors on April 5.
“Hyflux understands the frustration and regrets the dissatisfaction that has caused some stakeholders to protest," the company said in reply to a request for comment. “We hope that notwithstanding their disappointment in Hyflux, they will vote on the basis of what is commercially and legally realisable in terms of recovery. Unlike in a liquidation, the scheme permits junior ranking creditors to receive payment even when the senior creditors are not fully paid.”
Deadlines for Hyflux are looming and a dispute with the company’s suitor has deepened.
SM Investments, the closely held consortium of Indonesian businessmen that agreed last year to take a majority stake in the firm, said that it didn’t approve of the allocation of cash for working capital and repayment to creditors proposed by Hyflux under its court-supervised plan.