Bernard Madoff’s investment advisory business, alleged to be a Ponzi scheme that cost investors $50 billion, was never inspected by US regulators after he subjected it to oversight two years ago, people familiar with the case said.
The Securities and Exchange Commission hasn’t examined Madoff’s books since he registered the unit with the agency in September 2006, two people said, declining to be identified because the reviews aren’t public. The SEC tries to inspect advisers at least every five years and to scrutinise newly registered firms in their first year, former agency officials and securities lawyers said.
Madoff, 70, who had advised the SEC how to regulate markets and donated regularly to politicians, was arrested December 11 and charged with operating what he told his sons was a long-running Ponzi scheme in the New York-based firm’s business advising rich people, hedge funds and institutions. His ability to avoid detection may fuel debate about the SEC’s effectiveness and the adequacy of its resources for policing money managers.
“Given what the SEC claims is the magnitude of the fraud, this is something you would hope an inspection would have uncovered,” said Mercer Bullard, a University of Mississippi law professor and former mutual-fund attorney at the SEC. “It’s hard to imagine a fraud of this alleged size not being accompanied by significant and pervasive compliance problems.”
Madoff is scheduled to appear in federal court in Manhattan on December 19 at noon for a hearing in the SEC case, according to his lawyer, Ira “Ike” Sorkin, of Dickstein Shapiro LLP in New York.
“This is a tragedy,” said Sorkin, a former US prosecutor and SEC enforcement lawyer. “We are going to fight through these events and try to minimise the losses as much as possible.”
