Here are a few aspects that deserve the Jalan panel’s attention.
1) The RBI’s share capital has remained static at Rs 50 million since inception (1935). Is there a case for raising this to a decent level, say, the equivalent of $500 billion or upwards? If yes, should this be done by additional contribution by the government or by conversion of existing reserves?
2) Should the RBI create a ‘capital protection fund’ to insulate its capital from erosion in value? If yes, will the current provisions of the RBI Act cover the creation of such a fund or is an amendment to the Act necessary?
3) Is it not prudent accounting practice for the RBI to protect the value of its gold and foreign securities holdings against value erosion, instead of generating income by taking advantage of rupee depreciation? The panel must consider a more transparent accounting procedure to regularise the accounting practices followed by the RBI till recently. The fallacious argument in the Economic Survey (ES) 2016-17 about ‘surplus reserves’ emanated from certain wrong notions about RBI’s accounting practices with regard to the revaluation of non-rupee assets (gold, forex securities etc) that were promptly clarified by the then RBI governor Raghuram Rajan and the ES suggestion was not pursued. Rajan gave more elucidations on the subject in his New Delhi speech on September 3, 2016.
Hopefully, all these and more will get clarified when the expert panel on ECF submits its report.
M G Warrier Thiruvananthapuram
Letters can be mailed, faxed or e-mailed to:
The Editor, Business Standard
Nehru House, 4 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg
Fax: (011) 23720201 · E-mail: letters@bsmail.in
All letters must have a postal address and telephone number
 "Bimal Jalan")