Letter to BS: Points of disagreement
Agriculture moving from shortage to surplus is a distress story, says T N Ninan
)
premium
Photo: Shutterstock
I refer to the leading editorial "Output vs outcomes" (April 13), written by Mr T N Ninan. The distinction made by him between these two terminologies, output and outcome, is actually pedantic. It is not a philosophy book but a party manifesto. Output leads to outcome inevitably. To use the example of Mr Ninan, once a certain number of railway lines are electrified, automatically there will be impact on speed and volume of railway traffic. It does not have to be stated, nor can it be cardinally quantified in advance. The ulitilisation coefficient will vary over time. Similarly, the other example is the number of Jan Dhan accounts. He says that it is the output while the number of transactions is the outcome. I do not agree that it is any different. It is not necessary that there should be more transactions. I have made extensive enquiry with the rickshaw-walas in Delhi as I travel by rickshaw for short distances. Having an account is enough for them. They save about Rs 1,000 per month and that, they say, they will spend for making a house in future or marry their daughter. Having the saving is enough for them as it is even for the middle class.