It noted that the Memon had voluntarily agreed to appear by tele-conferencing and to make arrangements for it but that was not accepted by the agency.
Justice Vibhu Bakhru relied on a judgement of the Delhi High Court division bench in Lalit Kumar Modi's case in which it was observed that Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) did not entail custodial interrogation and, therefore, a request for an alternate mode of examination by video conferencing ought not to be shrugged aside.
"This court is of the view that the controversy involved in the present petition is covered by the decision of the division bench in Lalit Kumar Modi (supra) and the petitioner's (Memon) passport could not be suspended in public interest," the judge said.
"The impugned order suspending the petitioner's passport is set aside. However, it is clarified that respondent no.3 (ED) is not precluded from initiating any other proceedings as permissible in law," the court said.
The court disposed of Memon's plea challenging suspension of his passport by the Centre in August 2015, on the ED's request to revoke the travel document for his refusing to join the investigation despite issuance of summons.
He claimed that the action of the authorities to impound his passport was arbitrary as it was not based on any relevant material and was completely contrary to the records.
The ED had alleged that Memon has been involved in money laundering and has transferred the sale proceeds of assets in India, belonging to his late father to foreign countries.
Pursuant to these allegations, certain directives were issued to him by the agency and summons were issued asking him to appear in person.
The authorities also contended that section 3 of the FEMA covers resident, non-resident and foreign nationals and various regulations of the Act are also applicable to NRIs.
He was called to furnish information in relation to four companies Vantage Enterprises Pvt Ltd, Rock Stone Reality & Hotels Pvt Ltd, Realtors Hotels Projects Pvt Ltd and Horizon Estate Constructors Pvt Ltd.
Though he had responded to ED's letters and also supplied the required documents, he failed to appear before it in person.
On September 22, 2015, the Consulate General of India, Dubai issued a letter suspending his passport for refusing to join the investigation carried out by the ED despite the issue of summons, which was challenged by him in the high court.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)