You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

SC is incorruptible: ASG

Press Trust of India  |  Mumbai 

The of is "incorruptible" and any claim of perceived interference by the in the judiciary is unfounded, Additional said today.

Anand, whose tenure as the ASG was recently extended till 2020 by the Union government, said constant apprehensions or questions on the judgments or views taken by the courts, including the SC, must stop as they affect the sanctity of the institution, and referred to the matters like Loya's death and Aadhaar.

"The is incorruptible. There is no interference by the government in the day-to-day functions of the courts. However, constant apprehensions or questions on the judgments or views taken by the courts, including the SC, must stop," said at the Today Conclave here.

"SC decides all cases solely on the rule of However, these constant questions affect the sanctity of the institution. These questions, be it the matters of Loya, Aadhaar, Hadiya, at some point, we need to call it a day," said, referring to the death of the judge, who was presiding over the trial of the Sohrabuddin Shaikh encounter case, and other controversial issues before the apex court.

She was responding to her Indira Jaising's allegations of corruption within the judiciary and the consequent unprecedented press conference held by four SC judges earlier this year.

Earlier, during the day, Jaising had alleged that the often interfered with the judiciary, particularly, in appointments of judges in the high courts and the

"Most appointments are political. Even if the collegium recommends the name of a particular judge, the government sits indefinitely on that appointment if it is not politically convenient. And this (political interference in appointment of judges) used to happen even before 2014," Jaising said.

"One must remember that without a free press and an independent judiciary, we (the citizens) will be at immense loss," she said.

Both Jaising and Anand, however, agreed that despite apprehensions, and questions of judicial overreach and under-reach, the citizens still had faith in the rule of That is why cases of all sorts, be it something as personal as marriage, the right to privacy, demonetisation, and the mandir issue, reach the courts, both said.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Sat, March 10 2018. 18:55 IST