By Aditi Shah and Abhirup Roy
MUMBAI (Reuters) - India's Tata Motors
The company said only that its management had the "full confidence" of the board's six independent directors.
Mistry is still the chairman of several key Tata companies including Tata Motors and Tata Steel
The Tata group is now seeking to remove Mistry from Tata Motors, a battle that has also revived debate around India's corporate governance and Tata's complex structure.
Also Read
Tata Motors did not address the issue in a statement issued on Monday, however, noting simply that all decisions taken by the board of Tata Motors on strategy and operations have been "unanimous" and executed by the chairman and the management.
The statement came on the same day the company posted its results for the three months ended Sept. 30. It made a consolidated net profit of 8.48 billion rupees, which compared with a net loss of 17.40 billion rupees in the same period last year, on total income from operations up 7 percent at 670 billion rupees.
"Tata Motors ... generates a substantial profit and revenues, so it is important for Tatas to have control over the board," said Shriram Subramanian, managing director of InGovern Research Services, a firm advising institutional investors.
Tata Sons on Thursday removed Mistry as chairman of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS)
Boards at Tata Steel and Tata Chemicals voted to keep Mistry as chairman last week.
Directors of Tata Global Beverages
If the Tata Motors board does not oust Mistry, Tata Sons will have to turn to shareholder meetings. Tata Sons has already called for extraordinary general meetings across its companies to remove Mistry as a director, including Indian Hotels Co
Tata Sons has blamed Mistry's abrupt exit on what it called breach of trust and poor performance, accusing him of eroding shareholder value. It has also said Mistry tried to reduce the role of Tata Sons, controlled by a series of charitable trusts.
Mistry has argued he tried to create internal barriers for better governance - a move that would reduce the Tata trusts' involvement in the operational issues of group companies, which he said should be controlled by their own boards of directors.
The Tata trusts collectively own about two thirds of Tata Sons, while infrastructure company Shapporji Pallonji, owned by Mistry's family, is a minority shareholder in Tata Sons and he remains a director on the board of the holding company.
"A philanthropy running a commercial business creates its own paradoxes," said Institutional Investor Advisory Services, a proxy advisory, in a note about the feud.
Tata Sons said on Sunday said it was "crucially important" for the board members, including independent directors, to consider the future of Tata companies and its stakeholders. A spokesman declined to comment further.
(Additional reporting by Promit Mukherjee; Editing by Stephen Coates, Greg Mahlich)
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content


