Metro vs road: Economic Survey 2026 flags citizen conduct dichotomy
Economic Survey explains why Indians follow rules on metros but not roads, arguing behaviour changes with system design, enforcement and social norms
)
Metro systems, it noted, also carry a degree of status and civic pride
Listen to This Article
Why do Indians behave “impeccably” on metro trains but become unruly on the road or other public transit options? Chief Economic Advisor (CEA) V Anantha Nageswaran flagged this anomaly in the Economic Survey of 2025-26, stressing that getting India’s urbanisation right is not just about expanding infrastructure or drafting better policies, but also about how citizens behave within public systems.
“Citizens have an important role to play…what can be done to make sure that there is no difference in the way citizens respond to Metro rail as well as public transportation or road discipline,” the CEA stressed at a briefing.
“Behaviour that appears unruly or indifferent to the commons in one context becomes orderly, considerate and norm-abiding in another — often within the same city, the same class of users, even the same individuals. Orderly conduct in the Metro rail service in Indian cities and the queues that greet the Mumbai BEST service are examples,” noted a special section on contextual compliance in the Survey’s chapter on urbanisation.
The Survey argues that this contrast is not cultural but contextual, and behaviour towards the commons changes with the design and functioning of public systems. Better outcomes emerge when rules, incentives and social norms align, the Survey noted, citing metro rail systems as a case study of how structured environments transform behaviour. It pointed out that metro systems are designed to minimise ambiguity about acceptable conduct.
Clear entry and exit points, barriers, marked queues and platform doors convert undifferentiated public spaces into rule-guided environments. When the environment signals order, people tend to follow it.
Also Read
There is a credible expectation of enforcement in the metro, the Survey notes, citing the presence of staff, surveillance and fines that create a background “shadow of authority”. Crucially, enforcement is consistent and impersonal, unlike in many other public settings where rules are negotiable or unevenly applied. Where rules are perceived as fair and predictable, compliance becomes easier to internalise.
It emphasized repeated interaction among strangers within a stable system that allows cooperative social norms to develop. Over time, queuing and giving space become shared social scripts, reinforced not just by authorities but also by peer disapproval. Deviation attracts social sanction, nudging behaviour towards order rather than disorder.
The Survey argues that better civic behaviour does not come only from stricter laws or repeated awareness campaigns, it comes from systems that are easy to understand, reliable to use and fair in how rules are applied.
When citizens see that public services work predictably and that rules are the same for everyone, cooperation becomes natural rather than forced. The Survey argues that governments can improve urban life by focusing on clear design, consistent enforcement and dependable services, instead of relying only on penalties or appeals.
Behavioral governance offers a practical and low cost way to make cities work better by encouraging people to do the right thing without being constantly told to do so, the Survey said.
Metro systems, it noted, also carry a degree of status and civic pride. They symbolise modernity and efficiency, encouraging users to treat them as valuable shared assets. Where public spaces appear poorly maintained or captured by vested interests, citizens feel less moral obligation to care for them.
More From This Section
Topics : Economic Survey Metro Rail road infrastructure
Don't miss the most important news and views of the day. Get them on our Telegram channel
First Published: Jan 29 2026 | 10:45 PM IST