The Supreme Court on Wednesday stayed the verdict of the insolvency appellate tribunal, NCLAT, approving Rs 158.9 crore dues settlement of edtech major Byju's with the BCCI. A bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud also stayed the NCLAT verdict setting aside the insolvency proceedings against Byju's. It issued notices to Byju's on a plea of US-based creditor Glas Trust Company LLC against the NCLAT verdict. The bench, also comprising justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, directed the BCCI to keep in a separate account Rs 158.9 crore received by it from Byju's in view of a settlement. On August 2, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) had approved the Rs 158.9 crore dues settlement with the BCCI and set aside insolvency proceedings against Byju's, a move that will effectively put Byju Raveendran back in control of the firm.
Expresses deep concern about being asked to interfere with proceedings in another country's judicial system
The NCLAT noted that "money being offered by the largest shareholder and former promoter (Riju Raveendran) has nothing to do with the US lenders, which gives the court power to rule"
Formation of committee of creditors stayed till August 2
Raveendran's brother had made part-payment on Tuesday
Byju's Founder Byju Raveendran's plea against the Insolvency of Think & Learn before the NCLAT was adjourned on Monday as one of the members of the bench recused from the hearing. The matter will be placed before a bench headed by National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Chairman Justice Ashok Bhushan, who will assign a different bench to hear the matter. Raveendran had filed a petition challenging the initiation of insolvency proceedings against of Think & Learn, which runs edtech company Byju's. The matter was listed on Monday before a two-member Chennai-based bench of the NCLAT comprising Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Member (Judicial), and Jatindranath Swain, Member (Technical). However, Justice Sharma recused himself from the hearing, saying he had appeared as the counsel for the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) before his elevation. "I have appeared as a senior counsel for (the) BCCI. Since they are the main beneficiaries of this order, I cannot take ...
Byju's is currently dealing with claims exceeding Rs 200 crore from multiple creditors, including Rs 158 crore owed to BCCI
The edtech firm has urged the Court to stay the insolvency resolution process as well as the formation of the Committee of Creditors (CoC)
Byju's owes its creditors - BCCI, OPPO, Surfer Technologies, Cogent E Services, McGraw Hill Education India, and iEnergizer Services - more than Rs 200 crore
Byju's, once valued at $22 billion, is seeking an urgent hearing at NCLAT against the insolvency order by NCLT based on a plea from BCCI over the non-payment of Rs 158 crore
Crisis-ridden Byju's has moved the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) against the recent order of NCLT that allowed cricket board BCCI's petition for initiating insolvency proceedings against the once-famed edtech company, sources said. Sources privy to the development said that the company is seeking an urgent hearing on the matter. Byju's did not comment on the issue. According to sources, Byju's on Thursday moved the appellate tribunal, NCLAT, contesting the recent order of NCLT's Bengaluru bench that had admitted the cricket board's plea to start insolvency proceedings against the parent company Think and Learn, after the edtech firm failed to pay Rs 158.9 crore dues. Founder and CEO Byju Raveendran will report to the resolution professional. NCLT has appointed Pankaj Srivastava as the interim resolution professional. Byju's had previously sponsored the Indian cricket team. Earlier this week, Byju's had said it is hopeful of reaching "an amicable settlement" with
Byju's is currently restricted from issuing shares and using funds raised from a $200 million rights issue until the tribunal decides the matter
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has directed the NCLT to hear afresh the insolvency plea filed by APL Apollo Tubes against one of its purchasers of goods. A two-member bench came down heavily on the Bengaluru bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for rejecting claims of APL Apollo Tubes on the "hypothetical interpretation". The NCLAT said the tribunal "should refrain from stepping into the shoes of a litigating party by substituting their own finding in the absence of there being any pleading evidence". The appellate tribunal has directed the NCLT to make all efforts to decide proceedings as expeditiously as possible. The NCLAT order came over a petition filed by APL Apollo Tubes against an order of the NCLT, which, on September 9, 2019, dismissed its insolvency plea filed as an operational creditor against Tanisha Scaffolding. Tanisha Scaffolding was engaged in marketing the products manufactured by APL Apollo Tubes. Some amount against supplies wa
Jaypee Infratech's shares on the BSE are currently suspended. The company, as of May 24, is under the management of Suraksha Group, following NCLAT approval
Insolvency appellate tribunal NCLAT has issued a notice to ICICI Bank over the plea of Jaiprakash Associates Ltd and said the private sector lender may consider the one-time settlement proposal submitted by the debt-ridden company by June 24, the next date of hearing. During the proceedings of NCLAT, JAL through its counsel submitted that it is inclined to make the entire payment within 18 weeks, if the OTS is accepted by the Bank, which was opposed by creditors alleging that the total debt is over Rs 26,000 crore. Earlier, JAL moved a one-time settlement Proposal (OTS) to creditors before the NCLT, which had a provision of an upfront amount of Rs 200 crore and the balance of about Rs 16,000 crore to be paid on or before 18 weeks from its acceptance. However, this was dismissed by the Allahabad bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and directed to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against JAL, which was challenged before NCLAT. In its order, a
The suspended board of debt-ridden Jaiprakash Associates has moved appellate tribunal NCLAT challenging last week's NCLT order which directed initiation of insolvency proceedings against the firm. The petition was listed before a vacation bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which declined to grant an interim stay on the NCLT order. On June 3, the Allahabad bench of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) admitted the insolvency plea filed by ICICI Bank. The tribunal also appointed Bhuvan Madan as Interim Resolution Professional of JAL after suspending the board of the company. In September 2018, ICICI Bank had filed an insolvency petition against JAL under Section 7 of IBC. The NCLT rejected JAL's contention that it faced a liquidity crunch and defaulted on debt repayments mainly due to delays in government approvals and prolonged litigation concerning land acquisition for Yamuna Expressway and changes in government policies. It has been held by the Supreme
NCLAT dismissed an appeal filed by the four investors - MIH EdTech Investments, a subsidiary of Prosus NV, General Atlantic Singapore, Peak XV Partners Operations LLC, and Sofina
Insolvency Appellate Tribunal NCLAT has upheld orders approving Adani Goodhomes' resolution plan for realty firm Radius Estate with a 93 per cent haircut for creditors. A two-member bench comprising the NCLAT Chairman rejected the petitions by two dissenting financial creditors, saying it was "commercial wisdom" of the Committee of Creditors (CoC), which approved the payout to different creditors. The Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on January 9, 2022, approved the resolution plan of Adani Goodhomes, a part of Adani Realty. As per the resolution plan, which received an 83.99 per cent of the vote of the CoC and was approved by NCLT, nearly 700 flat owners were getting possession of without escalation of any price. The plan was opposed by two dissenting financial creditors -- Beacon Trusteeship and ICICI Prudential Venture Capital Fund Real Estate -- before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). According to reports, Adani Goodhomes had propose
Insolvency appellate tribunal NCLAT on Friday deferred hearing to July 5 on the petitions filed against tech giant Google over its Play Store billing policy. A two-member National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) bench, after a brief hearing over the petitions, directed listing the matter after summer vacations on July 5. Indian Broadcasting and Digital Foundation (IBDF), Indian Digital Media Industry Foundation, People Interactive India which operates Shaadi.com, and Mebigo Labs which operates Kuku FM have filed petitions before the NCLAT against Play Store billing policy. During the proceedings, counsel appearing from app developers requested the bench to pass an order directing status quo till the next date of hearing, though Google had not de-listed them from the Play Store for non-acceptance of policy terms. They urged the appellate tribunal to ask Google for an undertaking to this effect. Google's counsel refused to give an undertaking, however, assured the NCLAT that
Insolvency Appellate Tribunal NCLAT on Friday upheld Suraksha Realty's bid to acquire debt-ridden Jaypee Infratech Ltd but asked it to pay an additional around Rs 1,300 crore as farmers' compensation. Upholding the National Company Law Tribunal's (NCLT) decision of March 2023, the NCLAT said the decision was to avoid any further delay in the implementation of the resolution plan and to take care of the interests of all stakeholders, including home buyers and claim of Yamuna Express development authority YEIDA for additional compensation of the farmers. NCLT had on March 7, 2023, approved the bid of Mumbai-based Suraksha group to buy Jaypee Infratech Ltd (JIL), giving relief to more than 20,000 home buyers whose investments are stuck across various projects being developed in Delhi-NCR. "The impugned order passed by the adjudicating authority (NCLT) deals with the claim of the appellant (YEIDA) of Rs 1,689 crore of additional farmers compensation is set aside and the rest of the ord