Arguing against the practice of appointing senior Supreme Court advocates through a writ petition, lawyer Mathews Nedumpara pronounced the name of Fali S. Nariman, himself a distinguished Supreme Court lawyer, which the two judge-bench found to be contempt in the face of court.
The plea by National Lawyers Campaign was to do away with the system of appointing senior advocates by the judges, which Nedumpara argued to be a system used partially by the judges to promote their relatives.
It is in this context on March 5, Nedumpara happened to take the name of Fali S. Nariman, which did not find favour with the bench.
"Conduct of this kind deserves punishment which is severe. Though we could have punished Nedumpara by this order itself, in the interest of justice, we issue notice to Nedumpara as to the punishment to be imposed upon him for committing contempt in the face of the court.
"Notice returnable within two weeks from today," the court said in its order dismissing the writ petition.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)