What will happen to the old bridge? It can’t stay where it is. It will impede river traffic along the Hooghly. Therefore, it would have to be dismantled and auctioned. In the process, a valuable piece of history and heritage would have been lost. This is precisely what happened with most of our steam locomotives. As far as I can make out, some bits of Jubilee Bridge will now be saved from the auctioneer’s hammer and lodged somewhere. There are other old bridges too. Heritage Directorate of the Indian Railways (IR) now has an inventory of such heritage bridges; there are 21 on the list. You will find Jubilee Bridge listed at number 8, as the bridge between Hooghly Ghat and Garifa stations. I am not sure why the old Yamuna Bridge in Delhi, popularly known as Lohe ka Pul, is not included in this list of heritage bridges. This is old, too, constructed between 1863 and 1866. Its companion bridge, the Yamuna Bridge in Naini that opened in 1865, figures in the IR list of heritage bridges. I suspect non-inclusion is because of the way “heritage” is defined within IR. It isn’t necessarily a function of age. A “heritage” site is determined by the railway zone concerned. In Delhi, a new Yamuna Bridge is being built for trains. But unlike Jubilee Bridge, the old Yamuna Bridge won’t be demolished and auctioned. It will be used for road traffic.
Rather oddly, directly through IR, it is not easy to get the number of old bridges, though the figure must exist in the system. The best source is CAG, the latest being Audit Report No 24 of 2015 (for Railways). This tells us there are 136,728 bridges. Of these, 36,470 are more than 100 years old and 6,680 more than 140 years old. “Bridges constructed prior to 1905 were of early steel and stated to contain higher proportion of sulphur, making it prone to brittleness. These bridges were referred to as ‘technically obsolete bridges’. The Corporate Safety Plan (CSP) envisaged that all early steel/cast iron pile bridges would be phased out of the system by the end of the CSP viz, by 2013 duly prioritising these bridges during rehabilitation/ reconstruction. Audit, however, observed that no specific time frame was fixed by the Railway Board (RB) to phase out the obsolete bridges.” Perhaps I have been a bit hasty in saying figures must exist in the system. An earlier (Number 9 of 2003) CAG report also mentioned bridges. That one had a better “Census” of bridges. However, it also said: “Railway administrations are not having complete and proper records pertaining to the railway bridges. For monitoring of bridge works, it is imperative that proper records of construction of bridges are maintained. It was observed that in respect of 5,883 bridges, (1,850 in Central and 4,033 in North Eastern Railways), year of construction was not available with the railway administrations. Further, there were discrepancies in the records.”
Both CAG reports highlight delays in rehabilitation of old bridges. The Corporate Safety Plan of August 2003 promised by 2013 rehabilitation/ rebuilding of 2,700 bridges over the next four years; annual rehabilitation of 600 distressed bridges; and rehabilitation of 19,000 bridges that are technically obsolete over the next 10 years. IR hasn’t been able to adhere to those timelines. What is the oldest railway bridge? Given lack of information, I am not sure there is a clear answer. The Dapoorie Viaduct, built in 1858, by Great Indian Peninsular Railway (GIPR) must be one of the earlier ones. But there is a way to cheat and deflect the question. The bridge across the Kabini (Nanjangud) was constructed in 1735 and is a heritage structure. This was originally used for road traffic. When a metre gauge line was built, railways also started using this bridge, probably from 1889. With broad gauge conversion, trains used a different bridge now. However, the Kabini bridge still stands and 1735 is close to what is officially recognised as the oldest surviving railway bridge in the world. This is Causey Arch in England, built in 1725-26 to transport coal from collieries.
The writer is a member of the National Institution for Transforming India Aayog. The views are personal