The petition, filed by Pune unit chief of People for Animals headed by BJP MP Maneka Gandhi, has questioned whether this section can apply to information within public domain such as Facebook, Twitter, blogs, websites and other forms of communication which is for public and not just individuals.
In his petition, Manoj Oswal has contended that section 66 A was ultra vires the constitution and sought directions to stay arrests or filing of cases against people who disclose information in public domain.
Oswal cited the instance of posts made by two Palghar girls on Facebook who were arrested for criticising 'Mumbai Bandh' during Shiv Sena Chief Bal Thackeray's funeral in November last.
He also referred to the arrest of cartoonist Aseem Trivedi for airing his opinion through his creative works on the Internet and argued that such arrests were illegal.
Oswal said he had created a website www.Savelila.In against Prataprao Pawar, brother of NCP Chief Sharad Pawar, for allegedly grabbing land of an animal shelter and illegally detaining a lady in her own house. The cyber crime branch of Pune police had arrested him for making such a website as it had caused "inconvenience" to complainant Prataprao Pawar.
Oswal filed a petition challenging the FIR against him and sought directions from High Court to quash it after which the court stayed the proceedings against him.
However, during the course of arguments, an issue was raised whether law can suppress public opinion on a topic.
The petitioner questioned the validity of the law and, considering the larger issue involved, filed a separate PIL challenging section 66 A of IT Act.
The matter was heard before a bench headed by Justice A M Khanwilkar on January 31 when the union government counsel urged that it may be heard along the petition for quashing FIR against Oswal.
The petition was placed before another bench of Justices Abhay Oka and A P Bhangale, which heard arguments and posted it for further hearing on February 27. (more)
