You are here: Home » Opinion » Columns
Business Standard

Sunita Narain: The chicken crisis

It is a fact that our food is getting to be unhealthy - not because of deliberate adulteration, but because we are choosing to produce it in unsafe ways. The fact also is that in India we still have a choice

Sunita Narain 

Sunita Narain

What should I eat now? Is there nothing that is safe?" This is what I am asked every time we at the (CSE) do a study on toxins in food. It is a fact that our food is getting to be unhealthy - not because of deliberate adulteration, but because we are choosing to produce it in unsafe ways. The question is, what should we do? The fact also is that in India we still have a choice. We are only beginning this journey of industrial food production, which is focused on efficiency and profits and not on consumer safety and health. So why do we not want to get it right? Why should we not exercise our right to food that secures livelihoods and nutrition?

This time we have looked at in The laboratory bought 70 samples of from different markets spread across the National Capital Region. It analysed each animal for six antibiotics: oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline and doxycycline (class tetracyclines); enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin (class fluoroquinolones); and neomycin, an aminoglycoside. All these are critical for humans. These are the same medicines we are prescribed when we are taken ill - they are life-saving drugs.


We know today that antibiotic resistance is a near health pandemic - it is said that humans are headed towards a post-antibiotic era, where these miracle medicines will simply not work. It is also a fact that no new class of has been discovered for the past 20-odd years. So what we have is what we should keep for critical treatment. It is also well know that resistance is growing because of our over-exposure to - microbes become resistant to the drug, which is then no longer effective for treatment.

But what we do not realise is that our over-exposure to is growing also because of the food we eat - this food has been grown by serving it This is what we found in the samples. Of the 70 samples, 40 per cent - about every second we tested - had antibiotic residues and 17 per cent of the samples had more than one antibiotic present in the muscles, kidneys or livers.

There is a link between the we found in and the problem of antibiotic resistance in humans. In India, 13 studies done in various hospitals across the country have found evidence of resistance to the same we found in This is not a coincidence. It is a deadly fact.

The question then is, what do we do? Should we stop eating Or should we insist that is produced without Can it be done?

The fact is that the industry uses not to treat diseased chickens. It uses because it is worried that chickens will get diseased. They are bred in over-crowded and, often, highly unsanitary conditions. So farmers pump in drinking water to prevent any outbreaks. Their need to use is driven by the method they have chosen to produce our food.

This is not all. The industry uses also for profit. When chickens are given antibiotic laced-feed, they put on weight. So farmers buy in bulk and mix it in the feed. Or they simply buy the pre-mix feed manufactured by the big poultry, which includes and whose labels claim that it will promote growth in broiler

And why not? There is no regulation against the use of in chickens. At best, all that the government has done till date is to issue some weak and inconsequential guidelines for "judicious" use of in animals. The Bureau of Indian Standards specification for feed - which says that should not be used as growth promoters - is not mandatory. So the use of continues and grows - all at the cost of our health.

What should be done? This is where we need to choose the direction of future policy - the way we will produce and regulate safety in our food. There are three options before us. One, that we follow the way of the United States, which has not yet regulated the use of as growth promoters in its industry. Instead, it has set limits for antibiotic residues that can be present at different levels in different parts of chickens - kidneys, livers or muscles. Or we can follow Denmark, Sweden and some others who restrict and even ban the use of certain in animals. Or if we can find another approach, even better for health and livelihoods. This is our only choice. Let's discuss this.

sunita@cseindia.org
Twitter: @sunitanar

First Published: Sun, August 10 2014. 22:49 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU