You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

SC to hear on Feb 6 plea to bring CBI under ambit of RTI Act

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

The Supreme today fixed February 6 for hearing a plea challenging the government's 2011 decision to keep the out of the ambit of the Right to Information Act. A bench of and justices A M Khanwilkar and posted the matter for final hearing after the parties said that they need time to make detailed submissions on the issue. The case was first filed in the High Court, but later transferred to the top after the Centre had said that several petitions in this regard have been filed in different high courts across the country. A PIL seeking that the probe agency be brought under the RTI Act was filed in 2011 in the High by Agrawal, who had contested the 2014 elections from constituency against The high had, in July 2011, issued notices to the and the as the had alleged that the agency was brought out of the ambit of the RTI after he sought information regarding documents relating to the politically- sensitive Bofors payoff case. The had told the high that the exemption granted to the under RTI was not a "blanket exemption" and does not warrant judicial interference. The petition said that the exemption from RTI was prevalent for intelligence and security organisations, including Intelligence Bureau, RAW, DRI and ED. When the agency filed the plea for transfer of all similar matters from different high courts to the apex court, the proceedings before the High got stayed. In the fresh application before the apex court, Agrawal has alleged that the government's 2011 notification was issued "solely to scuttle the RTI appeal pending before the Chief Information Commissioner, New in regard to the Bofors case in which order was passed by the CIC directing the to provide the requisite papers to the petitioner". Agrawal, who was pursuing Bofors payoff case for years, has sought quashing of the Centre's June 9, 2011 notification, contending that "by issuing the notification and placing in the second Schedule, the appears to be claiming absolute secrecy for without the sanction of the law." The petition has claimed that the government's move appeared to be "arbitrary" in nature. With no reasons advanced, "citizens are likely to deduce that the purpose of including the in the Second Schedule was to curb transparency and accountability from the investigations of several cases against high- ranking officers", it contended.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Mon, January 08 2018. 20:11 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU