Wednesday, December 17, 2025 | 10:58 AM ISTहिंदी में पढें
Business Standard
Notification Icon
userprofile IconSearch

Lonely planet

Image

Jai Arjun Singh New Delhi

The Social Network is a David Fincher film rather than just a ‘Facebook’ movie

An early scene in David Fincher’s 1995 thriller Se7en has an elderly police detective named Somerset (Morgan Freeman) alone in his room at night, sitting up in bed, probably suffering from insomnia. Later in the film, when Somerset and his young partner break into the den of a psychotic serial killer (known only as “John Doe”), they discover hundreds of notebooks full of incoherent rants — outpourings against the world and the people in it — scribbled in the killer’s writing. Still later, we learn that John Doe isn’t just committing grisly murders built around the seven deadly sins; he’s playing God, at least in his own mind; he’s exposing human foibles, revealing the world for the awful place that it is.

 

On the face of it, nothing in this dark film seems like it could be related to the story of the sophomoric birth and subsequent growth (and growth, and growth) of a social-networking website. And Fincher — a director with a distinct, bleached visual style, who is drawn to gloomy, often unpleasant narratives — hardly seemed like the right person to helm a movie about Facebook. As a fan of his earlier work, I was bemused about what The Social Network would turn out to be.

And yet, within the first 10 minutes of this film, I felt a little thrill — the thrill that can come from seeing a gifted director take unpromising material and bend it to his own purposes. The Social Network is about a young misfit — Mark Zuckerberg — who demonstrates his inability to relate to other people (including his girlfriend) in the very opening scene. This is a guy who has already spent a lot of time cocooned by himself in front of his computer, writing thousands of lines of code; for his towering achievement, he will create a concept that captivates a generation (while also revealing some not-very-flattering things about Internet denizens, and people in general). In the cyber-age, what better way to play God?

I’m not making a direct comparison between Facebook founder Zuckerberg and a delusional serial killer, but it isn’t far-fetched to suggest a connection between John Doe’s warped interior life (where he no doubt spends a lot of time talking to himself) and the virtual-world seductiveness of a website where you can poke and share personal photographs with people whom you wouldn’t necessarily say hi to if you saw them across a room in the “real” world. (Side note: The Social Network is executive-produced by the actor Kevin Spacey, who played Doe 15 years ago.)

Social alienation and the attempt to deal with it — by trying to connect with people or by taking recourse in escapism — has been an important theme in Fincher’s work. In The Game (a 1997 movie that was in some ways prescient about game-playing in the online world), an unhappy, middle-aged banker is led through a series of situations that he believes are real, only to discover that his family and friends had played a carefully orchestrated prank on him. In Fight Club, adapted from Chuck Palahniuk’s brilliant novel, the nameless protagonist joins a support group for testicular-cancer patients (despite not being one himself) and later creates an alternate life for himself by willing a new personality into being. In the relatively conventional thriller Panic Room, the theme of isolation was given a literal treatment: a woman and her little daughter are trapped in the “panic room” of their new house while a gang of thieves try to get in. Fincher even managed to take a quaint 1920s short story (F Scott Fitzgerald’s The Curious Case of Benjamin Button) and turn it into a very modern-seeming parable about a life literally lived backwards.

It doesn’t take much effort to see the lines joining these films, and The Social Network is a culmination of sorts for Fincher. A question that he and screenwriter Aaron Sorkin would have faced is: how do you make a serious, involving movie about the creation of Facebook anyway? Apart from being a seemingly flippant subject, this is history so recent that the protagonists are real-life celebrities who are around the same age as the actors hired to portray them! What they did was to turn Zuckerberg into an enigmatic cipher, a genius whose motives are never entirely clear. By underlining the irony that the young man who launches a billion “friendship requests” is oddly friendless himself in the real world — and that he betrays the only real friend he has, in the movie at least — they gave the story a powerful dramatic arc.

“Mark Zuckerberg is the youngest millionaire in the world” the film’s closing title tells us, but it’s imposed on a shot of Zuckerberg alone in a room, endlessly refreshing his FB page to see if his ex-girlfriend has accepted his “friend request”. The image is a pitiable one, but it’s also a comment on the very particular form that alienation has taken in the Internet age. With hindsight, David Fincher was the right director to deal with the phenomenon of millions of insomniac sociopaths staring unblinkingly into their computers, convinced that they are, in some meaningful way, “connected”.

Don't miss the most important news and views of the day. Get them on our Telegram channel

First Published: Nov 20 2010 | 12:25 AM IST

Explore News