The dilemma over bauxite duties: Hurting miners, helping aluminium firms
Whenever high export duty is imposed to conserve resources, overseas despatches fall steeply as in the case of iron ore and now, non-metallurgical grade bauxite
)
premium
Photo: Shutterstock
India is richly endowed with bauxite. At an estimated 3.48 billion tonnes, the country has 11 per cent ownership of the world bauxite resources. Bauxite is found in two varieties. The highly sought-after metallurgical grade is refined into alumina for smelting into white metal. The non-metallurgical grade finds application in refractories, abrasives and cement.
The local market for the latter grade being small, it is imperative that Indian mines find easy access to the world market without being hindered by export duty.
But like iron ore, non-metallurgical grade bauxite is embroiled in an unending controversy as to whether India should strike a liberal stance on its exports or preserve it, irrespective of the size of the bounty for future local use. Whenever the government imposes a high export duty on grounds of resource conservation, overseas despatches fall steeply because they become globally price uncompetitive.
This happened with disastrous consequences for iron ore when in December 2011 export duty was hiked to 30 per cent. Iron ore exports declined from an all-time high of 117.37 million tonnes (mt) in 2009-10 to 4.50 mt in 2015-16. After the high duty led to major disruptions in mining, New Delhi removed duty on ore with up to 58 per cent iron content. But the continuation of 30 per cent duty on better grades ore for which there is demand in China is restricting imports from India.
“What is seen with iron ore is much in evidence with bauxite exports of non-metallurgical grade with low 38 to 40 per cent alumina content and the presence of high degrees of silica of up to 6 per cent. Overseas sales took a big hit in the last couple of years as a 15 per cent export duty made it uncompetitive in the world market,” says R K Sharma, director general of Federation of Indian Mineral Industries.
No wonder, then, bauxite exports slid from 8.91 mt in 2015-16 to 2.5 mt in 2016-17. The current year is seeing a further contraction in exports, throwing the mines in coastal zones of Gujarat and Maharashtra in a quandary. Drying up of export sales has shrunk bauxite mining operation in the two states leading to job losses.
“Considering that our exports are of a grade for which domestic demand is to remain limited, we were hopeful of the duty being dropped in the 2018-19 Budget. To our disappointment that didn’t happen. But we will continue to pursue the duty waiver issue with the government,” says Sharma. He worries about India being seen as a practitioner of resource nationalism.
However, there can be no two opinions as to the need to conserve metallurgical grade bauxite for value addition to alumina. High quality bauxite found in abundance in Odisha has encouraged the aluminium industry to grow alumina refinery capacity in a big way. Two of the three aluminium producers in the state get all the mineral they need from their large captive deposits for making alumina. The continuing success of the government owned National Aluminium Company (Nalco) is underpinned by its abundant ownership of bauxite deposits at Panchpatmali hills in Odisha.
The local market for the latter grade being small, it is imperative that Indian mines find easy access to the world market without being hindered by export duty.
But like iron ore, non-metallurgical grade bauxite is embroiled in an unending controversy as to whether India should strike a liberal stance on its exports or preserve it, irrespective of the size of the bounty for future local use. Whenever the government imposes a high export duty on grounds of resource conservation, overseas despatches fall steeply because they become globally price uncompetitive.
This happened with disastrous consequences for iron ore when in December 2011 export duty was hiked to 30 per cent. Iron ore exports declined from an all-time high of 117.37 million tonnes (mt) in 2009-10 to 4.50 mt in 2015-16. After the high duty led to major disruptions in mining, New Delhi removed duty on ore with up to 58 per cent iron content. But the continuation of 30 per cent duty on better grades ore for which there is demand in China is restricting imports from India.
“What is seen with iron ore is much in evidence with bauxite exports of non-metallurgical grade with low 38 to 40 per cent alumina content and the presence of high degrees of silica of up to 6 per cent. Overseas sales took a big hit in the last couple of years as a 15 per cent export duty made it uncompetitive in the world market,” says R K Sharma, director general of Federation of Indian Mineral Industries.
No wonder, then, bauxite exports slid from 8.91 mt in 2015-16 to 2.5 mt in 2016-17. The current year is seeing a further contraction in exports, throwing the mines in coastal zones of Gujarat and Maharashtra in a quandary. Drying up of export sales has shrunk bauxite mining operation in the two states leading to job losses.
“Considering that our exports are of a grade for which domestic demand is to remain limited, we were hopeful of the duty being dropped in the 2018-19 Budget. To our disappointment that didn’t happen. But we will continue to pursue the duty waiver issue with the government,” says Sharma. He worries about India being seen as a practitioner of resource nationalism.
However, there can be no two opinions as to the need to conserve metallurgical grade bauxite for value addition to alumina. High quality bauxite found in abundance in Odisha has encouraged the aluminium industry to grow alumina refinery capacity in a big way. Two of the three aluminium producers in the state get all the mineral they need from their large captive deposits for making alumina. The continuing success of the government owned National Aluminium Company (Nalco) is underpinned by its abundant ownership of bauxite deposits at Panchpatmali hills in Odisha.