SPONSORED BY

Auto Segment
Mutual Fund Segment
My Budget
Expert Speak
In Association With
 
Business Standard

Vinayak Chatterjee: The enemy within

It is ridiculous to make the task of clearing sovereign obstacles the private sector's core competence

Related News

Ask any infrastructure developer and he will tell you that the biggest risk factor is the government itself. The “sovereign” does not inspire confidence when, paradoxically, in financial markets, sovereign debt and sovereign guarantees are supposedly the safest you can get. Infrastructure developers will also tell you that the situation is akin to being invited to dinner as a valued guest; and as soon as you arrive at your host’s gate, you get roughed up, beaten and sometimes even killed by the guards on duty. The private sector, lest we forget, is “invited” to “bid” for public utilities by the sovereign. Private capital is “welcomed”. Half of the nation’s trillion-dollar infra development is to be done by valued and esteemed “invitees”.

So, Kafkaesquely, while one arm of the sovereign invites and welcomes, 65 other arms – security men who guard the host’s gates – rough up the invitee. (Click here for table)

The enemy is within!

Why private enterprises should be beaten and bruised in the process of is the biggest riddle of our times. Well, the time has come to force the sovereign to clear obstacles it has itself placed on the path to speedy implementation. The private sector, with one voice, should say clearing sovereign obstacles is not its core competence. And that the sovereign cannot abdicate its responsibility of clearing the minefield.

Here are three ways to bite the bullet.

One, infrastructure ministry: This column had set out 10 “good” reasons to have one (“From policy paralysis to action station,” April 16). One of the principal reasons was to have a nodal body for securing all “sovereign permissions” in a purposive, time-bound and facilitative manner. The column even suggested that the current statistics and programme implementation ministry could well be re-fashioned into a new-age infra ministry, and statistics could be handed over to the Planning Commission.

Two, sovereign-incubated special purpose vehicle (SPV): Over and above the infra ministry, one of the finest moves possible is to have sponsoring sarkari authorities first set up 100 per cent sarkari-owned SPVs to implement a project. In its sarkari avatar, this SPV should secure all permissions and clearances. Then, it should bid out the SPV to the highest bidder. In mid-May, the Prime Minister’s Office woke up to the immense practical possibilities of this move when it circulated a note suggesting this to all economic ministries. This should be done right away.

Three, penalties on sponsoring authorities: In future, let all infra public-private-partnership (PPP) bids carry a special annexure listing 100 per cent of the permissions required, clearly delineating the responsibilities of the sovereign sponsoring authority. The bid legalese must impose severe penalties for delays on the sponsoring authority if it fails to keep its side of the bargain and does not act and behave as a responsible PPP partner. Get babudom and its political leadership to be publicly and monetarily accountable. Otherwise, let them not merely bid out as bemused observers.

The prime ministerial announcement of June 1, 2012, of “an investment-tracking mechanism to expedite the implementation of big ticket projects” did not lead to any surge of adrenalin. In fact, it was seen to be nothing more than navel-gazing and a knee-jerk PR effort immediately after the announcement of disastrous GDP numbers. The infra meeting of the PM on June 6 saw the delivery of homilies and platitudes and a laundry-list of new projects, producing nothing more than a yawn.

It’s time to get real. Gentlemen, let’s go for real solutions.


 

The author is chairman of Feedback Infrastructure. These views are personal. vinayak.chatterjee@feedbackinfra.com  

Read more on:   
|
|
|
|

Read More

Kishore Singh: Venice the menace

The Brazilian honeymooner was my age by any reckoning, his glamorous bride a little younger, and like us they’d reserved berths in the overnighter ...

Recommended for you

Most Popular Columns

T N Ninan

T N Ninan: Suresh Prabhu, the Railway star
T N Ninan

Prabhu was the architect of the Electricity Act of 2003, which set the stage for reforms in the power sector. He could well end up transforming the railways

Anjuli Bhargava

Anjuli Bhargava: Air India and your old Ambassador car
Anjuli Bhargava

The national carrier has a host of ownership and legacy problems. Unless there are some changes, competitors will keep whizzing past

Claude Smadja

Claude Smadja: The West's terrorist challenge
Claude Smadja

There is no war against Islam, but there is definitely one against Islamic radicalism

Advertisement

Columnists

T N Ninan

T N Ninan: Suresh Prabhu, the Railway star
T N Ninan

Prabhu was the architect of the Electricity Act of 2003, which set the stage for reforms in the power sector. He could well end up transforming ...

Andrew Sheng & Xiao Geng

Andrew Sheng & Xiao Geng: China's dual-track challenge
Andrew Sheng & Xiao Geng

China's state-owned enterprises do significantly worse than their private-sector counterparts, despite having better access to credit

Aditi Phadnis

Aditi Phadnis: Consensus building and why it counts
Aditi Phadnis

The Bharatiya Janata Party might have a majority in the Lok Sabha but sarcasm and public humiliation of rivals may not be the way to assert ...

Back to Top