You are here: Home » Reuters » News
Business Standard

Verizon says Yahoo hack 'material,' could affect deal

Reuters  |  WASHINGTON 

By David Shepardson

(Reuters) - Communications Inc said on Thursday it has a "reasonable basis" to believe Inc's massive data breach of email accounts represents a material impact that could allow to withdraw from its $4.83 billion deal to buy the technology company.

Verizon's general counsel Craig Silliman told reporters at a roundtable in the data breach could trigger a clause in the deal that would allow the U.S. wireless company not to complete it.

"I think we have a reasonable basis to believe right now that the impact is material and we're looking to to demonstrate to us the full impact. If they believe that it's not then they'll need to show us that," he said, declining to comment on whether talks are under way to renegotiate the purchase price.

Asked for comment, a spokesman said: "We are confident in Yahoo's value and we continue to work towards integration with Verizon."

The deal has a clause that says can withdraw if a new event "reasonably can be expected to have a material adverse effect on the business, assets, properties, results of operation or financial condition of the business."

Silliman said the U.S. Federal Trade Commission has approved Verizon's planned acquisition of Yahoo, but it still needs approval from the European Commission and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is reviewing the proxy.

has had preliminary briefings from but it still needs "significant information" from the company before it makes a final decision on the materiality of the hacking of at least 500 million email accounts, Silliman said.

He said is "absolutely evaluating (the breach) and will make determinations about whether and how to move forward with the deal based on our evaluation of the materiality."

shares ended 1.75 percent lower at $41.62, while was largely unchanged, closing at $50.29, down 0.02 percent.

in September disclosed that it had fallen victim to a data breach in 2014 that compromised users' names, email addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth and encrypted passwords.

The company has said the attack was carried out by a "state-sponsored" actor, but some private security experts have challenged that assertion.

Several Democratic senators have pressed to reveal more information about the hack and why it took so long to discover.

The internet firm said it learned of the breach this summer while investigating claims of a separate intrusion, but it has not provided a specific timeline of events.

Some analysts suggested may be trying to get a better price.

Roger Entner, an analyst at Recon Analytics, said "is rightfully upset about not properly disclosing the breach."

He said would most likely have to consider renegotiating the price with Verizon, if it came to that.

"I don't think it has much of a choice. Who else would want to buy them?" Entner said.

Experts said bidders who try to extract themselves from mergers using the material adverse clause face an uphill battle. No U.S. company has ever invoked the clause successfully in court to get out of a deal.

In 2013, Cooper Tire & Rubber company got cold feet about a $2.5 billion sale to Apollo Tyres and argued in the Delaware Court of Chancery that Apollo had seen a material adverse change related to union issues at a subsidiary of the company. The court rejected Cooper Tire's claims and the deal fell apart.

A Delaware court ruled in 2001 that poultry producer Tyson Foods Inc could not terminate its merger with beef producer IBP Inc over accounting irregularities. The court said the shortfall was not due to a long-term problem.

(Reporting by David Shepardson, additional reporting by Dustin Volz in Washington, Malathi Nayak in New York and Liana Baker in San Francisco; editing by Leslie Adler, Andrew Hay and Bernard Orr)

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Verizon says Yahoo hack 'material,' could affect deal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Verizon Communications Inc said on Thursday it has a "reasonable basis" to believe Yahoo Inc's massive data breach of email accounts represents a material impact that could allow Verizon to withdraw from its $4.83 billion deal to buy the technology company.

By David Shepardson

(Reuters) - Communications Inc said on Thursday it has a "reasonable basis" to believe Inc's massive data breach of email accounts represents a material impact that could allow to withdraw from its $4.83 billion deal to buy the technology company.

Verizon's general counsel Craig Silliman told reporters at a roundtable in the data breach could trigger a clause in the deal that would allow the U.S. wireless company not to complete it.

"I think we have a reasonable basis to believe right now that the impact is material and we're looking to to demonstrate to us the full impact. If they believe that it's not then they'll need to show us that," he said, declining to comment on whether talks are under way to renegotiate the purchase price.

Asked for comment, a spokesman said: "We are confident in Yahoo's value and we continue to work towards integration with Verizon."

The deal has a clause that says can withdraw if a new event "reasonably can be expected to have a material adverse effect on the business, assets, properties, results of operation or financial condition of the business."

Silliman said the U.S. Federal Trade Commission has approved Verizon's planned acquisition of Yahoo, but it still needs approval from the European Commission and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is reviewing the proxy.

has had preliminary briefings from but it still needs "significant information" from the company before it makes a final decision on the materiality of the hacking of at least 500 million email accounts, Silliman said.

He said is "absolutely evaluating (the breach) and will make determinations about whether and how to move forward with the deal based on our evaluation of the materiality."

shares ended 1.75 percent lower at $41.62, while was largely unchanged, closing at $50.29, down 0.02 percent.

in September disclosed that it had fallen victim to a data breach in 2014 that compromised users' names, email addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth and encrypted passwords.

The company has said the attack was carried out by a "state-sponsored" actor, but some private security experts have challenged that assertion.

Several Democratic senators have pressed to reveal more information about the hack and why it took so long to discover.

The internet firm said it learned of the breach this summer while investigating claims of a separate intrusion, but it has not provided a specific timeline of events.

Some analysts suggested may be trying to get a better price.

Roger Entner, an analyst at Recon Analytics, said "is rightfully upset about not properly disclosing the breach."

He said would most likely have to consider renegotiating the price with Verizon, if it came to that.

"I don't think it has much of a choice. Who else would want to buy them?" Entner said.

Experts said bidders who try to extract themselves from mergers using the material adverse clause face an uphill battle. No U.S. company has ever invoked the clause successfully in court to get out of a deal.

In 2013, Cooper Tire & Rubber company got cold feet about a $2.5 billion sale to Apollo Tyres and argued in the Delaware Court of Chancery that Apollo had seen a material adverse change related to union issues at a subsidiary of the company. The court rejected Cooper Tire's claims and the deal fell apart.

A Delaware court ruled in 2001 that poultry producer Tyson Foods Inc could not terminate its merger with beef producer IBP Inc over accounting irregularities. The court said the shortfall was not due to a long-term problem.

(Reporting by David Shepardson, additional reporting by Dustin Volz in Washington, Malathi Nayak in New York and Liana Baker in San Francisco; editing by Leslie Adler, Andrew Hay and Bernard Orr)

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Verizon says Yahoo hack 'material,' could affect deal

By David Shepardson

(Reuters) - Communications Inc said on Thursday it has a "reasonable basis" to believe Inc's massive data breach of email accounts represents a material impact that could allow to withdraw from its $4.83 billion deal to buy the technology company.

Verizon's general counsel Craig Silliman told reporters at a roundtable in the data breach could trigger a clause in the deal that would allow the U.S. wireless company not to complete it.

"I think we have a reasonable basis to believe right now that the impact is material and we're looking to to demonstrate to us the full impact. If they believe that it's not then they'll need to show us that," he said, declining to comment on whether talks are under way to renegotiate the purchase price.

Asked for comment, a spokesman said: "We are confident in Yahoo's value and we continue to work towards integration with Verizon."

The deal has a clause that says can withdraw if a new event "reasonably can be expected to have a material adverse effect on the business, assets, properties, results of operation or financial condition of the business."

Silliman said the U.S. Federal Trade Commission has approved Verizon's planned acquisition of Yahoo, but it still needs approval from the European Commission and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is reviewing the proxy.

has had preliminary briefings from but it still needs "significant information" from the company before it makes a final decision on the materiality of the hacking of at least 500 million email accounts, Silliman said.

He said is "absolutely evaluating (the breach) and will make determinations about whether and how to move forward with the deal based on our evaluation of the materiality."

shares ended 1.75 percent lower at $41.62, while was largely unchanged, closing at $50.29, down 0.02 percent.

in September disclosed that it had fallen victim to a data breach in 2014 that compromised users' names, email addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth and encrypted passwords.

The company has said the attack was carried out by a "state-sponsored" actor, but some private security experts have challenged that assertion.

Several Democratic senators have pressed to reveal more information about the hack and why it took so long to discover.

The internet firm said it learned of the breach this summer while investigating claims of a separate intrusion, but it has not provided a specific timeline of events.

Some analysts suggested may be trying to get a better price.

Roger Entner, an analyst at Recon Analytics, said "is rightfully upset about not properly disclosing the breach."

He said would most likely have to consider renegotiating the price with Verizon, if it came to that.

"I don't think it has much of a choice. Who else would want to buy them?" Entner said.

Experts said bidders who try to extract themselves from mergers using the material adverse clause face an uphill battle. No U.S. company has ever invoked the clause successfully in court to get out of a deal.

In 2013, Cooper Tire & Rubber company got cold feet about a $2.5 billion sale to Apollo Tyres and argued in the Delaware Court of Chancery that Apollo had seen a material adverse change related to union issues at a subsidiary of the company. The court rejected Cooper Tire's claims and the deal fell apart.

A Delaware court ruled in 2001 that poultry producer Tyson Foods Inc could not terminate its merger with beef producer IBP Inc over accounting irregularities. The court said the shortfall was not due to a long-term problem.

(Reporting by David Shepardson, additional reporting by Dustin Volz in Washington, Malathi Nayak in New York and Liana Baker in San Francisco; editing by Leslie Adler, Andrew Hay and Bernard Orr)

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard