 "A visual representation of the dispute between China and Philippines")
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is preparing to leave for a Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) plenary meeting in South Korea on June 23-24, for a last-ditch attempt to gain India membership of that body. Meanwhile, an international arbitration court is finalising a ruling that would allow New Delhi to strike back at Beijing, if it continues to oppose Indian membership.
Within days, the United Nations’ Permanent Court of Arbitration, in The Hague, is likely to rule against China in a case filed by the Philippines in 2013. Manila has challenged Beijing’s militant claim over much of the South China Sea. A ruling against China would give New Delhi the opportunity to directly criticise Beijing.
China has claimed the UN court does not enjoy jurisdiction on this issue, which it says should be resolved through bilateral talks. It also claims that 60 countries, including India, support this position. So far, just seven countries have confirmed support to China. India has withheld comment, a restraint it would be in a position to abandon.
While never having criticised China directly, New Delhi has demanded “freedom of navigation” in the western Pacific, especially the South China Sea. Earlier this year, Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar spoke at the ASEAN Defence Ministers Meeting Plus, forthrightly demanding that “freedom of navigation” be respected in these waters. Parrikar struck the same note at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore in May. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his speech to the US Congress, went so far as to suggest a “US-India partnership [to] anchor peace and stability from Asia to Africa, and from the Indian Ocean to the Pacific.”
The Philippines has taken before the UN arbitration court competing claims by six countries — China, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, Taiwan and the Philippines — in a 3.5-million-sqkm stretch of ocean, from Taiwan to Singapore. China has the most expansive claim, expressed through the so-called “Nine-Dash Line” that it bases on historical domination dating back 2,000 years.
The multiple claims centre on two island chains — the Paracel and Spratly islands — and rocky outcrops and shoals near the Philippines called the Scarborough Shoal. These areas are believed to hold abundant natural resources, including oil, natural gas, minerals and fishing grounds.
Half the world’s trade passes through shipping lanes in this region.
Manila has appealed to the United Nations court that China’s claim violates the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, which allocates each country an “exclusive economic zone” (EEZ) within 200 nautical miles (370 km) of its coastline. China claims significantly more.
With each claimant country vigorously pursuing its claims, the region has been heavily militarised, most of all by China. Besides the People’s Liberation Army (Navy) and a well-trained and equipped Coast Guard, Beijing provides its fishermen military training for decades, according to numerous press reports from the region.
Meanwhile, the US has declared its intention to station fighter aircraft in the Philippines.
Within days, the United Nations’ Permanent Court of Arbitration, in The Hague, is likely to rule against China in a case filed by the Philippines in 2013. Manila has challenged Beijing’s militant claim over much of the South China Sea. A ruling against China would give New Delhi the opportunity to directly criticise Beijing.
China has claimed the UN court does not enjoy jurisdiction on this issue, which it says should be resolved through bilateral talks. It also claims that 60 countries, including India, support this position. So far, just seven countries have confirmed support to China. India has withheld comment, a restraint it would be in a position to abandon.
While never having criticised China directly, New Delhi has demanded “freedom of navigation” in the western Pacific, especially the South China Sea. Earlier this year, Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar spoke at the ASEAN Defence Ministers Meeting Plus, forthrightly demanding that “freedom of navigation” be respected in these waters. Parrikar struck the same note at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore in May. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his speech to the US Congress, went so far as to suggest a “US-India partnership [to] anchor peace and stability from Asia to Africa, and from the Indian Ocean to the Pacific.”
The Philippines has taken before the UN arbitration court competing claims by six countries — China, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, Taiwan and the Philippines — in a 3.5-million-sqkm stretch of ocean, from Taiwan to Singapore. China has the most expansive claim, expressed through the so-called “Nine-Dash Line” that it bases on historical domination dating back 2,000 years.
The multiple claims centre on two island chains — the Paracel and Spratly islands — and rocky outcrops and shoals near the Philippines called the Scarborough Shoal. These areas are believed to hold abundant natural resources, including oil, natural gas, minerals and fishing grounds.
Half the world’s trade passes through shipping lanes in this region.
Manila has appealed to the United Nations court that China’s claim violates the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, which allocates each country an “exclusive economic zone” (EEZ) within 200 nautical miles (370 km) of its coastline. China claims significantly more.
With each claimant country vigorously pursuing its claims, the region has been heavily militarised, most of all by China. Besides the People’s Liberation Army (Navy) and a well-trained and equipped Coast Guard, Beijing provides its fishermen military training for decades, according to numerous press reports from the region.
Meanwhile, the US has declared its intention to station fighter aircraft in the Philippines.
