You are here: Home » Economy & Policy » News
Business Standard

Taxing liaison offices: Revenue to move HC

Anindita Dey  |  Mumbai 

Tribunal rules that the offices cannot be termed permanent establishments.

The revenue department has decided to challenge an Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) order that liaison offices of foreign firms operating in India cannot be termed as permanent establishments (PEs).

The tribunal’s December 24 ruling concerned Tokyo-based Mitsui and Company, which has investments in various sectors in India, including machinery, chemicals, energy, lifestyle, iron and steel, information technology and food products.

The Income Tax Department had attributed 50 per cent of the income Mitsui earned from its Indian operations to the liaison office, which it termed a PE, for assessment year 2002-03. Tax officials said that if a company had a PE in India, the income would be taxed as business income. If a foreign company operating in India is taxed on its business income and the country does not have a specific double taxation avoidance treaty with India, the tax rate on income and gains is 55 per cent.

However, the department is in the process of filing a petition challenging the order in the high court since the ruling has revenue implications running into hundreds of crores. This is because almost all international tax cases hinge on whether or not the company has a PE in India.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development tax guidelines say a foreign firm is deemed to have a PE in a country if it employs an agent, other than an independent agent, to regularly act for it and conclude contracts on its behalf.

Although the order did not clearly specify the reason clearly, tax experts said the liaison office might not be termed as PE if it did not employ any agent to carry out the business or conclude contracts on its behalf. If a company’s income is not taxed as business income, it is taxed as royalty or technical fees.

On PEs, the Supreme Court had in July 2007 ruled out any tax liability in India of US-based investment bank Morgan Stanley on income from its India-based outsourcing outfit, Morgan Stanley Advantage Services (MSAS). The Supreme Court quashed the Income Tax Department’s contention that MSAS was not a PE.

Tax department officials do not agree with the tribunal’s ruling. “When the economy was opened up in 1991, many foreign companies opened liaison offices to explore investment and other opportunities. In 1995, the ITAT had given a ruling that a liaison office was not a PE. However, these liaison offices are no longer mere offices as major investments are being made through these offices,” said an official.

Additional reporting by Prashant K Sahu

 

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Thu, February 19 2009. 00:30 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.