You are here: Home » International » News » Politics
Business Standard

Social media firms put 'profit above principle' on news: S'pore minister

The minister pointed to the United States where lawmakers have also chided social media firms for allowing misinformation about the U.S. election to spread

Social Media | big tech | Fake news

John Geddie | Reuters  |  SINGAPORE 

Twitter | Representational image of social media

firms are hampered by their commercial interests when tackling fake news, Singapore's law minister said, underlining the need for the city-state's law against online falsehoods, which critics say stifles free speech.

K. Shanmugam, speaking on Thursday in an interview for broadcast at the Reuters Next conference on Tuesday, defended the city-state's new law against concern from the likes of Facebook that it is a censorship tool, and fears from rights groups and others that it is used for political gain.

He said the law was necessary because the platforms that often host have business models that depend on "attracting eyeballs".

The minister pointed to the United States where lawmakers have also chided firms for allowing misinformation about the U.S. election to spread, particularly ahead of the storming of the U.S. Capitol last week.

"The tendency has been on the side of the internet platforms to say: hey, it's free speech, there shouldn't be any regulation of it," Shanmugam, who is also Singapore's home minister, said.

"Let's be frank, when platforms argue against it (regulation), it's really putting profit above principle."

Shanmugam said there was a "consensus" developing around the world that tackling can't be left to the tech platforms, although he said it remained unclear how many countries would follow Singapore with regulatory measures.

Singapore's Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) introduced in late 2019 has been called the "most far-reaching legislation of its kind to date" by the Asia Internet Coalition, an association of internet and technology companies.

It allows government ministers to order news outlets, social media users or platforms to carry warnings that their pages or posts contain false statements, and to include links to a government fact-checking website.

There are more stringent actions, fines and even jail for non-compliance.

When ordered to block access to a page last year, Facebook said it contradicted the government's claim that the law was not a "censorship tool" and joined rights group in saying it could harm freedom of expression in Singapore.

The government says the law only tackles falsehoods and that legitimate criticism and free speech are not affected.

The law ensnared several government critics and opposition parties and politicians in the run up to the city-state's election in July last year, drawing concern from rights groups like Amnesty The law has not been used since.

"The fact that a number of them happen to be opposition politicians, suggests to you as to who then engages in such conduct," Shanmugam said when asked about those who have fallen foul of the law.

He said the reason for the law's inactivity since the vote was "because there haven't been such statements".


Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Tue, January 12 2021. 13:44 IST