The Madras High Court today directed the Tamil Nadu government to clarify whether a governor under Article 161 of constitution has to consult the Centre over premature release of convicts in cases handled by central agencies.
Posing the question on an appeal filed by Rajiv Gandhi assassination case life convict Nalini, a bench comprising Justices K K Sasidharan and R Subramanian posted the matter to April 23 for further hearing.
Nalini had filed the appeal against the 2016 order of Justice M Sathyanarayanan rejecting her prayer for premature release under a 1994 state government scheme under Art 161 (powers of Governor to grant pardon).
As per the scheme, life convicts who had served 20 years of prison term were eligible for pre-mature release.
The apex court in its order on the matter in March, 2016 had made it clear that for pre-mature release pleas under CrPc section 435, concurrence by the Centre was required in cases handled by central agencies such as the CBI.
When the appeal came up for hearing, counsel for Nalini argued that her plea did not fall under Sec 435 of CrpC and it was under Art 161. Hence there was no need for consultation.
Nalini had made a representation in February, 2014 seeking pre-mature release saying she had undergone imprisonment for more than 24 years.
She further submitted that her death sentence was commuted for life under article 161 of the Constitution on April 24, 2000.
Nalini contended that she was eligible to be released under the scheme announced by the state government on November 10, 1994.
She has been lodged in a special prison for women at Vellore for more than 26 years since her arrest in connection with the assassination of former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi at Sriperumpudur by an LTTE suicide bomber on May 21, 1991.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)