You are here: Home » Reuters » News
Business Standard

U.S. proposes to roll back emissions rule on new coal plants

Reuters  |  WASHINGTON 

By Humeyra and Gardner

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The on Thursday proposed to roll back an Obama-era rule requiring new U.S. coal plants to slash carbon emissions, a move that could crack open the door in coming years for new plants fired by the fossil fuel.

The (EPA) announced the proposal, which will allow new coal plants to emit up to 1,900 pounds (862 kg) of carbon dioxide per megawatt-hour of

The proposal, which is sure to be challenged by lawsuits from environmental groups, would replace the current limit of 1,400 pounds of carbon per megawatt-hour.

"We are rescinding unfair burdens, levelling the playing field," Wheeler said at a conference in Washington. He spoke alongside Harry Alford, of the National Black Chamber of Commerce, a long-time opponent of former Barack Obama's limits on carbon emissions.

Under the existing rule, new coal plants would have to burn some natural gas, which emits less carbon, or install or highly efficient technology that is not yet commercially available.

The lists only two major coal plants being planned over the next four years, as the industry has been discouraged by That could change as rolls back rules meant to curb emissions linked to global warming.

Mitch McConnell, a Republican, applauded the EPA's proposal, saying it would help families who work in the coal industry in his state of "Coal deserves a level playing field, and that's what this is trying to accomplish," McConnell said.

Myron Ebell, who led Trump's EPA transition team last year, said Trump's policies could allow new coal plants to be built in the next five, 10 or 15 years.

The administration says coal plants can be made to burn coal far more efficiently. But high costs have made them uneconomic. The regulatory roll-back comes ahead of annual U.N. climate talks in next week, where officials plan a panel on

It was unclear whether the proposal can withstand lawsuits. Jay Duffy, a legal associate at Clean Air Task Force, said the higher carbon emissions limit would not satisfy for the best available

While the the Obama rule requires is technologically feasible, it is expensive.

But Duffy said Obama's rule would eventually drive down costs.

"If Trump is really interested in supporting coal miners, what he should be looking at is supporting and advancing carbon capture," said Duffy. In a future where rules on carbon constraints are likely, "that's the only way coal survives," he said.

(Reporting by Gardner; editing by and Rosalba O'Brien)

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Fri, December 07 2018. 01:08 IST