SVB now threatens the start-up ecosystem, which is already in the throes of a funding winter due to raising interest rates
The lock-in on 75% of shares had led fund houses to markdown holdings in ETF and index funds to 'zero', as per recommendation from valuation committee of Amfi
Analysts at ICICI Securities believe near term risk include decision to write-down AT-1 bonds being challenged in court, which is currently stayed and supply overhang post expiry of stock lock-in
Passive trackers likely to sell 67 mn shares; another 1.35 bn could be offloaded by individual investors
YES Bank's stock is surrounded by a lot of speculations that the SBI may book at least partial profit and it may lead to more pressure on the stock
NSE Nifty50's sharp rebound from its 200-day moving average of 17,400 is what is giving technical analysts the requisite confidence
The Supreme Court on Friday issued notices to Axis Trustee Services Ltd on a batch of appeals filed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and others challenging a Bombay High Court order quashing a decision of the Yes Bank Administrator to write off Additional Tier 1 (AT-1) bonds. The top court also extended the stay on the operation of the Bombay High Court order quashing the decision of the Yes Bank Administrator to write off AT-1 bond worth Rs 8,415 crore as part of the bailout in March 2020. A bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, however, assured the AT-1 bond investors that it would try to find out some kind of solution to the financial trouble being faced by them after senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Axis Trustee Services Ltd, said the invested money has become zero for no fault of theirs. It was the top officials of the bank who brought down the bank. Their men are in jail. Our money has become zero... we are not Tata-Birla. We are institutional investors.
The Supreme Court on Friday issued notices to Axis Trustee Services Ltd on a batch of appeals filed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and others challenging a Bombay High Court order quashing a decision of the Yes Bank Administrator to write off Additional Tier 1 (AT-1) bonds. A bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud took note of the submissions of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for RBI, and senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Yes Bank, and extended the stay on the high court order quashing the decision of writing off AT-1 bonds. The Bombay High Court, while quashing the decision of the Yes Bank Administrator, had however said its decision will be in abeyance so the central bank and Yes Bank may appeal against it in the apex court. Issue notice. The stay granted (by the Bombay HC on its decision) will continue, said the bench, which also comprised justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala. AT-1 bonds have no maturity date. These debt instruments offer highe
The HC had given the bank six weeks' time to challenge the order in the apex court
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has directed to initiate insolvency proceedings against Zee Learn, following a petition filed by private sector lender Yes Bank Ltd. Yes Bank Ltd (YBL) had claimed a default of Rs 468.99 crore by the Essel Group company. Out of the default amount of Rs 468.99 crore, the principal amount was Rs 410.67 crore and Rs 58.32 was interest. The date of default was August 2, 2021. A two-member bench of the Mumbai NCLT said the application made by the financial creditor Yes Bank is complete in all respects as required by law. "It clearly shows that the Corporate Debtor (Zee Learn) is in default of a debt due and payable, and the default is in excess of the minimum amount stipulated under section 4(1) of the IBC," said NCLT. Therefore, the debt and default stand established and there is no reason to deny the admission of the Petition. "In view of this, this Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) admits this Petition and orders initiation of CIRP against the .
On January 20, the Bombay High Court had quashed YES Bank's decision to write off AT-1 bonds in March 2020
FPI holding rose to 20.18%, reinforced by Rs 47,349-crore inflows
Pental, who has been with YES Bank since November 2015, will continue to head retail banking; he is also non-executive director at YES Securities
The Supreme Court Tuesday set aside the Allahabad High Court order refusing to entertain the Yes Bank plea challenging police investigation into an FIR lodged by the Essel Group in connection with the bank-Dish TV dispute on pledging of shares. A bench comprising Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala also directed that its earlier order of November 30, 2021 staying police investigation in the FIR shall remain in operation till the high court has disposed of the Yes Bank's plea against the FIR. The top court remanded the case to the high court for fresh disposal on merits within a period of two months after the receipt of the certified copy of its order. We are of the considered view that the Allahabad High Court was not justified in not dealing with the petition (of Yes Bank) on the ground that the alternative remedy was available under section 451 and 457 of the CrPC (Code of Criminal Procedure). The high court ought to have addressed itself the ..
The stock tanks 8.33% following Bombay HC order and weak Q3 showing
The management said it would be difficult to give guidance on margins (NIMs) due to pressure from pricing deposits.
Stocks to Watch: Shares of Axis Bank, Canara Bank, IDBI, Jindal Stainless and Tata Communications will be in focus ahead of Q3 results on Monday.
YES Bank's net interest income was up 11.7% YoY in Q3 to Rs 1,971 crore. Sequentially, NII declined from Rs 1,991 crore
Net profit fell to Rs 51.52 crore for the three months through December from Rs 266 crore
Order stayed for six weeks; bank may challenge the verdict in SC