ALSO READS&P downgrades ratings of 34 Italian banks Recapitalise banks or brace for more fiscal problems: IMF Moody's cuts French banks' ratings Commerzbank joins Intesa in raising $19-bn capital before Basel rules Hinduja Bank to expand trade finance business RBI tells mkts to price state bonds on financial health After MFI turmoil, chit funds the next big draw Fino to tap northeast Low inflation gives room for policy rate cut: RBI SBI aims 19-20% credit growth this fiscal Equity International scouts investment in home finance SBI, Union Bank raise interest rates on FCNR-B deposits Govt banks can't invest in JVs, non-core ops without approval
Credit Agricole SA, France's third- biggest lender, and hedge fund Magnetar Capital LLC were sued by an investor in a collateralized debt obligation that claims to have been defrauded.
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA said in a complaint filed yesterday in Manhattan federal court that it lost $180 million after Credit Agricole's Calyon unit induced it in 2006 to invest in a CDO secretly structured by Magnetar to lose money. "Calyon itself would have borne that loss had it not fraudulently transferred the risk to Intesa," according to the complaint.
Intesa claims Calyon told investors that the CDO -- known as Pyxis ABS CDO 2006-1 -- was based on residential mortgage- backed securities that had been chosen by an independent investment firm, Putnam Advisory Co., when the underlying securities were really selected by Magnetar.
Putnam was also named as a defendant in the case.
"The scheme was designed by Magnetar," Intesa alleged. "Calyon collected fees on the deal and, through the Pyxis swap, shifted losses on the CDO which it would have otherwise borne itself."
Intesa, based in Turin, Italy, and formerly known as Banca Intesa SpA, seeks unspecified money damages in its fraud lawsuit.
Mary Guzman, a spokeswoman for Calyon, and Putnam spokesman Jon Goldstein didn't immediately return calls seeking comment on the filing after regular business hours yesterday.
Melinda McMullen, a spokeswoman for Evanston, Illinois- based Magnetar, also didn't immediately return a call seeking comment.
The case is Intesa v. Credit Agricole, 12-cv-2683, US District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).