Wednesday, December 31, 2025 | 06:32 AM ISTहिंदी में पढें
Business Standard
Notification Icon
userprofile IconSearch

'Trade hinges on connectivity, nations' policies'

Image

Hamid Ansari

Historically speaking, the geographical term “Central Asia” came into the vocabulary of European scholars and governments only in the middle of the 19th century. In the year 1900, the famous Russian historian Victor Barthold could find little about the recorded history of the area before the Arab conquest of 7th-8th centuries. A seminar organised by the Embassy of India, Tashkent in March 2000 sought to collate available information, mainly archeological, on the relations between India and Central Asia in the pre-Islamic period.

On the other hand, we do have sufficient evidence of conquerors... of trade in the medieval and pre-modern periods. The National Archives of India have recently published an interesting travelogue of Munshi Mohan Lal, who accompanied the British envoy Alexander Burns to Turkistan in 1831, on what was called “a knowledge-gathering” exercise. Burns’ own account, of course, remains a classic.

 

In more recent times, both Czarist Russia and the Soviet Union kept it a virtually “closed” region. This changed with the demise of the Soviet state and the emergence of the five republics, the so-called “stans”, as independent entities eager to retrieve their cultural identities benefit from their economic resources, and play a role on the world stage. By the same token, the geo-political space and its accompanying benefits vacated by the erstwhile Soviet Union was sought to be taken by others.

This audience knows well that foreign policy formulation rarely begins with a clean slate. Its building blocks, instead, consist of ground realities. Aspirations and objectives help give it shape; the baggage of the past is sought to be avoided but is rarely achieved comprehensively. Success thus lies, as Henry Kissinger put it, in “patient accumulation of partial successes”.

It is thus evident that the new ground realities in the post-Soviet period called for a redefining of India’s strategic interests in the region. Our primary interest was stability in the region. The task of diplomacy was to build new relationships and protect and enhance economic and commercial interests. We were successful in the first and are still struggling with the second...

Over the past two decades and despite being landlocked, Central Asia emerged as one of the fastest growing regions in the world, and has displayed considerable development potential. It is resource rich in terms of oil, gas, gold, cotton, rare-earths, has relatively advanced infrastructure and human capital, and enjoys the benefit of a strategic location between Asia and Europe. Many of the Central Asian Republics have embarked on market-oriented economic reforms to boost private sector competitiveness and economic performance. As a result, leading and aspiring powers are active in the region in quest of natural resources, energy pipelines and transit routes leading to wide ranging geo-political considerations pertaining to security, prevention of drug and arms smuggling, and countering terrorism and fundamentalism.

India’s own approach to the region has evolved over these 20 years and has recently been spelt out in its “Connect Central Asia” policy. This is focused on identification and furtherance of mutually beneficial interests, development of access routes and options, sharing of developmental experience in nation-building, offering economic and technical assistance... Pursuant to it, we have entered into strategic partnership agreements with three of the five Central Asian Republics — Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan — and have increased cooperation and dialogue between specialised security agencies and the defence forces.

Furtherance of trade and economic cooperation with the region, beginning with Afghanistan, hinges on connectivity, which in turn is intrinsically dependent on access-route options and its policy and practical implications. The easiest route, through Pakistan and Afghanistan, appears totally dependent on a good mix of human wisdom and divine intervention... A second point of access, through Iran and Afghanistan, is a real possibility and appears now to take shape through the proposed development of the Chabahar port and the completion of the Zaranj-Delaram highway...

Other elements of the 12-point “Connect Central Asia” policy are in various stages of initiative and implementation and have evoked positive responses from the Central Asian states. The emphasis on our political approach being non-prescriptive, while holding on to our own value system is timely.

No discussion on Central Asia and its immediate neighbourhood would be complete without taking on board the challenges arising out of the situation in Afghanistan. The lesson of history is that hegemonic prescriptions do not sustain themselves and result in greater chaos. The entire region would, therefore, benefit if realistic alternatives are thought of and Afghanistan drawn into a cooperative regional economic and security framework, so that nation-building there could proceed based on economic development, social harmony, rule of law and participatory democracy in consonance with the wishes of the Afghan people...

Though India is not part of any regional grouping so far, our role in regional fora like the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia would serve to strengthen India’s renewed links with the region. India’s engagement in Central Asia is also part of our belief in a multi-polar world. The world of tomorrow cannot and must not be visualised on the patterns of a past that resulted in misery and bloodshed. India wishes to eschew archaic concepts of Great Game and Grand Chessboard and, instead, be a partner for peace, stability and economic development in the region. India also hopes that the people of Central Asia do not give quarter to fundamentalism and religious extremism in their respective societies, since these trends are disruptive and hamper progress.


Excerpts from an inaugural address by Vice-President Hamid Ansari at the National Seminar on “India and Central Asia: Perspectives on Bilateral and Regional Cooperation”, on October 17 at the Centre for Research in Rural and Industrial Development, Chandigarh

Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper

Don't miss the most important news and views of the day. Get them on our Telegram channel

First Published: Oct 28 2012 | 12:12 AM IST

Explore News