Monday, January 05, 2026 | 12:02 PM ISTहिंदी में पढें
Business Standard
Notification Icon
userprofile IconSearch

IAS officer death: govt statements violation of fundamental

Image

Press Trust of India Bengaluru
Statements given by Karnataka government and its investigating agencies in the "unnatural death" of upright IAS officer D K Ravi are more offensive than the telecast of the documentary on Nirbhaya because investigation into the matter is incomplete as yet, it was contended in the Karnataka High Court today.

Making submissions for the husband of an IAS officer who was a batchmate of Ravi, his counsel Sajan Poovaiah said the government statements amounted to violation of fundamental rights of the citizen and outraging the dignity of women.

"The telecast of BBC documentary (on Nirbhaya) was illegal when the appeals in this case were pending in the Supreme court," he submitted.
 

BBC had aired the documentary, containing the controversial interview of a convict in the December 16,2012 gangrape despite a Delhi court prohibiting it. This evoked mixed reactions among political parties.

The High Court is hearing a petition filed by Sudhir Reddy, husband of the woman IAS officer, seeking restrictions on publication of any interim report or making any public statement pertaining to investigation being conducted by the government through CID.

Facing public outcry over the death of Ravi in mysterious circumstances, Karnataka government has handed over the case to CBI after allegations that he did not commit suicide as claimed by police. 35-year-old Ravi was found hanging from a ceiling fan at his apartment on March 16.

Countering the submissions made by Additional Advocate General A S Ponnanna, Poovaiah said "under the laws, there is no absolute power to make statements on the floor of the House, especially amid investigation," he said.

Poovaiah also submitted that when the investigation itself is incomplete, the respondents or the Chief Minister can hardly claim to be aware of the truth and are not empowered to disclose any information when the intent is to make the same public.

The High Court had, on March 24, directed Reddy to file objections to the government's plea.

The government had filed objections to the petition filed by Reddy seeking restrictions on publication of any interim report or making any public statement pertaining to investigation being conducted by the government through CID.

The government is seeking vacation of restraint on publishing or making public the interim report pertaining to the investigation carried out by CID into the death of Ravi.

Don't miss the most important news and views of the day. Get them on our Telegram channel

First Published: Apr 07 2015 | 9:13 PM IST

Explore News